Literature DB >> 1415221

Power of sib-pair and sib-trio linkage analysis with assortative mating and multiple disease loci.

W M Sribney1, M Swift.   

Abstract

Sib-pair linkage analysis has been proposed for identifying genes that predispose to common diseases. We have shown that the presence of assortative mating and multiple disease-susceptibility loci (genetic heterogeneity) can increase the required sample size for affected-affected sib pairs several fold over the sample size required under random mating. We propose a new test statistic based on sib trios composed of either one unaffected and two affected siblings or one affected and two unaffected siblings. The sample-size requirements under assortative mating and multiple disease loci for these sib-trio statistics are much smaller, under most conditions, than the corresponding sample sizes for sib pairs. Study designs based on data from sib trios with one or two affected members are recommended whenever assortative mating and genetic heterogeneity are suspected.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1415221      PMCID: PMC1682815     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  22 in total

1.  Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.

Authors:  D J Schaid; T G Nick
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Systems of Mating. III. Assortative Mating Based on Somatic Resemblance.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1921-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic segregation of multiple sclerosis and histocompatibility (HLA) haplotypes.

Authors:  M Alter; J Quevedo
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  A more powerful robust sib-pair test of linkage for quantitative traits.

Authors:  C I Amos; R C Elston; A F Wilson; J E Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  A model of assortative mating with partial dominance.

Authors:  A E Stark
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Assortative mating based on phenotype. I. Two alleles with dominance.

Authors:  F M Scudo; S Karlin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect of assortative mating on the genetic composition of a population.

Authors:  J F Crow; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Eugen Q       Date:  1968-06

8.  Power of the affected-sib-pair method for heterogeneous disorders.

Authors:  L R Goldin; E S Gershon
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Assortative mating among in-patients with primary affective disorder.

Authors:  K R Merikangas; D G Spiker
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Assortative mating among men and women alcoholics.

Authors:  T Jacob; D A Bremer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1986-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Genome scanning for linkage: an overview.

Authors:  A S Whittemore
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Effect of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis: a simulation study.

Authors:  C T Falk
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Simple, robust linkage tests for affected sibs.

Authors:  A S Whittemore; I P Tu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Combining information within and between pedigrees for mapping complex traits.

Authors:  J Teng; D Siegmund
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers.

Authors:  P Holmans; D Clayton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Association versus linkage studies in psychosis genetics.

Authors:  M M Nöthen; P Propping; R Fimmers
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Assortative mating for relative weight: genetic implications.

Authors:  D B Allison; M C Neale; M I Kezis; V C Alfonso; S Heshka; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.805

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.