Literature DB >> 3863778

A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.

W C Blackwelder, R C Elston.   

Abstract

An analytical study is conducted of the properties of statistical tests to detect linkage between a disease locus and a very polymorphic marker locus when data on sib pairs are available. In most instances the most powerful test is the test based on the mean number of marker alleles shared identical by descent by the two members of a sib pair, and the most efficient sampling strategy is almost always to sample only pairs with both sibs affected. We show it is valid to use the information from all possible sib pairs as though they came from separate families when data on sibships of size three or larger are available, though more power may be obtained if different weights are given to the different sibship sizes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3863778     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1370020109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  95 in total

1.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  W F Forrest; E Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A two-stage variable-stringency semiparametric method for mapping quantitative-trait loci with the use of genomewide-scan data on sib pairs.

Authors:  S Ghosh; P P Majumder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.

Authors:  S M Leal; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk.

Authors:  B A Rybicki; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A note on power approximations for the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  M Knapp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  All LODs are not created equal.

Authors:  D R Nyholt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test does not replace the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  S Horvath; C Windemuth; M Knapp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.

Authors:  K Wang; J Huang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  A survey of affected-sibship statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis.

Authors:  H Sengul; D E Weeks; E Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.