Literature DB >> 3536501

Comparison of a fluorescent monoclonal antibody assay and a tissue culture assay for routine detection of infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

J H Larsen, H C Wulf, A Friis-Møller.   

Abstract

The applicability of a commercial direct immunofluorescent monoclonal antibody assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies was studied on endocervical smears from 506 women attending a venereal disease clinic. The aim of this prospective examination was to simulate a daily routine. The results were compared to those of a well-functioning tissue culture assay. The overall positivity was 22.7%. Based on a positivity criterion of greater than or equal to 1 elementary body in the fluorescent antibody assay, the two assays agreed in 84.8% of the cases. In 50 specimens the antibody assay was positive and the culture assay negative, whereas in 23 the culture assay was positive and the antibody assay negative. The positive predictive value was 63.8%. Most of the discrepancies were found in specimens containing few elementary bodies or inclusions. Based on a criterion of greater than or equal to 10 elementary bodies, the positive predictive value was 70.9%, but the sensitivity fell to 67.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3536501     DOI: 10.1007/BF02017704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0722-2211            Impact factor:   3.267


  29 in total

1.  Rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis with monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  H Mallinson; G C Turner; P B Carey; M H Khan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in smears.

Authors:  I Harper; M Shearman; F Dalgety; D Cole
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Indirect immunofluorescence staining of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in microculture plates with monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  M Zapata; M Chernesky; J Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Two new tests for chlamydia get quick results without culture.

Authors:  L Wingerson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Rapid diagnosis of chlamydial infections with the MicroTrak direct test.

Authors:  C T Uyeda; P Welborn; N Ellison-Birang; K Shunk; B Tsaouse
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].

Authors:  B Dutilh; C Bebear
Journal:  Ann Biol Clin (Paris)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 0.459

7.  Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence applied in specimens originating in remote areas.

Authors:  T Williams; A C Maniar; R C Brunham; G W Hammond
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis with fluorescent monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  P G Hallsworth; P J McDonald
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.306

9.  A comparison of the sensitivity of immunofluorescence and Giemsa for staining Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells.

Authors:  P E Munday; A P Johnson; B J Thomas; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretions. A multicenter trial.

Authors:  W E Stamm; H R Harrison; E R Alexander; L D Cles; M R Spence; T C Quinn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  9 in total

1.  Just the berries. Diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Hickey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S S Hipp; Y Han; D Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  C J Hall; C Nelder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Authors:  T C Quinn; L Welsh; A Lentz; K Crotchfelt; J Zenilman; J Newhall; C Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.

Authors:  M S Pate; P B Dixon; K Hardy; M Crosby; E W Hook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections.

Authors:  R C Barnes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 26.132

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.