Literature DB >> 2404073

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures.

M Chernesky1, S Castriciano, J Sellors, I Stewart, I Cunningham, S Landis, W Seidelman, L Grant, C Devlin, J Mahony.   

Abstract

By using commercially available spectrophotometric and immunofluorescent immunoassays, Chlamydia trachomatis antigens were detected in first-void urine (FVU) sediments from 224 men attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic at a frequency of 81.6%-86.8% compared with 86.8% (33/38) positive by urethral swab culture (P less than .05). Endocervical cultures from 228 women attending a gynecology clinic yielded 92.3% (12/13) positive compared with 61.5%-76.9% for urine samples in three antigen-detection assays. Culturing urine from either gender yielded low positivity rates (23.7% for men, 15.4% for women). Defining truly infected patients as positive by culture or by any two of the three antigen tests, all assays were 100% specific. Immunodiagnostic testing of male FVU sediment appears to be a reliable, rapid, nontraumatic method for diagnosing chlamydia infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2404073     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/161.1.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  48 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.

Authors:  M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in adolescent men by examination of voided urine.

Authors:  I Mares; O Järnmark; B Kandell; M B Ekegren; L Svensson; B Vilhelmsson; L Forsman
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1992-10

4.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Control of genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  P R Gully; R W Peeling
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-05

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary samples from women.

Authors:  L O Svensson; I Mares; S E Olsson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

Review 7.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

8.  Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Factors affecting urine EIA sensitivity in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in men.

Authors:  H Talbot; B Romanowski
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.