Literature DB >> 8724186

Threshold values for supine and standing Cobb angles and rib hump measurements: prognostic factors for scoliosis.

G Duval-Beaupere1.   

Abstract

Seven parameters recorded at the first clinical examination of 326 growing scoliotic patients were correlated with the speed of progression of the scoliotic curve during a natural history survey period. The parameters were: age; bone age (according to Greulich and Pyle); pubertal and Risser stage; curve shape; rib hump, measured in forward bending in a sitting patient and supine and standing radiographic Cobb angles of the scoliotic curve. The speed of progression of the scoliotic curve was expressed as the annual increase in Cobb angle. It was quantified graphically after plotting the measurements taken from all the radiographic examinations made during the survey. The survey period ranged from 6 months to several years, depending on the rate of progression. It was 6 months only if the scoliotic curve demonstrated worsening of more than 3 degrees at two successive examinations performed at least 3 months apart. The authors aimed to identify the minimum values of curve angle and rib hump, identified at first examination in 95-100% of patients whose parameters at follow-up were above these values (supine angle: 17 degrees; standing angle: 24 degrees; rib hump: 11 mm), therefore demonstrating curve worsening. Then, they analysed how the other parameters such as age, bone age, state of maturation and curve shape influenced these threshold values of rib hump and supine and standing angles. The authors present the threshold values for the whole sample according to the sexual state of maturation and also for each curve shape. They demonstrate that a combination of states of maturation, several measures of the scoliotic curve and curve shape provides the best basis for individual prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8724186     DOI: 10.1007/BF00298385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

1.  [Radiological study of the poliomyelitic spine].

Authors:  R BOURDON; A GROSSIORD; G BEAUPERE; J P HELD
Journal:  J Radiol Electrol Arch Electr Medicale       Date:  1956 Nov-Dec

2.  [Developmental scolioses during the period of growth; clinical and radiological aspects and therapeutic considerations].

Authors:  P STAGNARA; P QUENEAU
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1953 Jul-Sep

3.  Prediction of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis based on initial roentgenograms. A proposal of an equation.

Authors:  Y Yamauchi; T Yamaguchi; Y Asaka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  [Maturation indices in the surveillance of scoliosis].

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupère
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1970 Jan-Feb

5.  Long-term follow-up of patients with idiopathic scoliosis not treated surgically.

Authors:  D K Collis; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Growth landmarks and the evolution of scoliosis: a review of pertinent studies on their usefulness.

Authors:  S Terver; R Kleinman; E E Bleck
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Scoliosis at less than 30 degrees. Properties of the evolutivity (risk of progression).

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupère; T Lamireau
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Rib hump and supine angle as prognostic factors for mild scoliosis.

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupère
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S L Weinstein; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Development of trunk asymmetries and structural scoliosis in prepuberal school children in Malmö: follow-up study of children 10-14 years of age.

Authors:  S Willner
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  5 in total

1.  Shear-wave elastography can evaluate annulus fibrosus alteration in adolescent scoliosis.

Authors:  Tristan Langlais; Claudio Vergari; Raphael Pietton; Jean Dubousset; Wafa Skalli; Raphael Vialle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Transverse plane 3D analysis of mild scoliosis.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Xavier Drevelle; Jean Dubousset; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Manuel Rigo; Hans Rudolf Weiss
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-04-10

4.  Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines).

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Stefano Negrini; Martha C Hawes; Manuel Rigo; Tomasz Kotwicki; Theodoros B Grivas; Toru Maruyama; Franz Landauer
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-05-08

5.  Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Ching-Lung Tai; Lih-Huei Chen; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.