Literature DB >> 4049108

Scoliosis at less than 30 degrees. Properties of the evolutivity (risk of progression).

G Duval-Beaupère, T Lamireau.   

Abstract

In an attempt to find prognostic factors for mild scoliosis, the first clinical and radiologic data of 159 subjects with idiopathic scoliosis less than 30 degrees were correlated with the annual speed of progression estimated graphically by further examinations. Thoracic and double major are more progressive than thoracolumbar and lumbar. The correlation with rate of progression is better for supine angle than for standing angle. Curves with low supine angles are those that have great relative collapse and low risk of progression. Only the rib hump of thoracic and thoracolumbar are correlated with evolutivity. Predictive equations give less approximation for individual prognosis than a previous graphic method, so they are not used. Approximately 73% of scoliosis have evolutivities less than 6 degrees per year and required nocturn corrective treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4049108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Threshold values for supine and standing Cobb angles and rib hump measurements: prognostic factors for scoliosis.

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupere
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal balance measures are more reproducible when measured in 3D vs in 2D using full-body EOS® images.

Authors:  Masashi Okamoto; Fouad Jabour; Kenichiro Sakai; Shun Hatsushikano; J C Le Huec; Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The impact of residual growth on deformity progression.

Authors:  Ismat Ghanem; Maroun Rizkallah
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

Review 4.  Progression or not progression? How to deal with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis during puberty.

Authors:  Alain Dimeglio; Federico Canavese
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Spinal growth and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Ylikoski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  3D analysis of brace treatment in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Xavier Drevelle; Raphael Vialle; Jean Dubousset; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Transverse plane 3D analysis of mild scoliosis.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Xavier Drevelle; Jean Dubousset; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Manuel Rigo; Hans Rudolf Weiss
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-04-10

9.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 71 Cases Study Ascertaining that Straightening Is Possible, and a New Etiological Hypothesis.

Authors:  Jan Polak
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-11-28

10.  Clinical effect of continuous corrective force delivery in the non-operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective cohort study of the TriaC-brace.

Authors:  Gerben J Bulthuis; Albert G Veldhuizen; Gert Nijenbanning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.