Literature DB >> 3206284

Prediction of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis based on initial roentgenograms. A proposal of an equation.

Y Yamauchi1, T Yamaguchi, Y Asaka.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted in 122 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who were followed for more than 2 years. There were 58 patients who showed 5 degrees (Cobb) or more progression, and 41 patients who showed no progression. Only those who did not receive any treatment or who failed to comply with brace treatment were selected, to eliminate the effect of treatment. In the early phase of the study, 12 parameters were put into a multivariate analysis to observe the relative weight of each of them, which led the authors to eliminate the following five parameters: 1) Cobb angle, 2) rotation of the apical vertebra, 3) deviation of the apical vertebra, 4) Risser's expected correction: (standing angle--supine angle) X 3, and 5) maturation index of the iliac apophysis. Through a multiple regression analysis, an equation was obtained to correlate the predictive and the real progression within 10 degrees deviation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3206284     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198811000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of scoliosis progression with serial three-dimensional spinal curves and the artificial progression surface technique.

Authors:  Hongfa Wu; Janet L Ronsky; Farida Cheriet; Jessica Küpper; James Harder; Deyi Xue; Ronald F Zernicke
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Threshold values for supine and standing Cobb angles and rib hump measurements: prognostic factors for scoliosis.

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupere
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Claims and realities of brace treatment : Primary correction of scoliosis in children and adolescents].

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsaknakis; Lena Braunschweig; Heiko M Lorenz; Anna K Hell
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST): Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model in Untreated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using the Simplified Skeletal Maturity System.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Stuart L Weinstein; Mark F Abel; Patrick P Bosch; Matthew B Dobbs; Tyler O Farber; Matthew F Halsey; M Timothy Hresko; Walter F Krengel; Charles T Mehlman; James O Sanders; Richard M Schwend; Suken A Shah; Kushagra Verma
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-11

5.  Low body mass index can be predictive of bracing failure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Weixiang Sun; Jin Zhou; Minghui Sun; Xiaodong Qin; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu; Leilei Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines).

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Stefano Negrini; Martha C Hawes; Manuel Rigo; Tomasz Kotwicki; Theodoros B Grivas; Toru Maruyama; Franz Landauer
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-05-08

7.  Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis--a test of the 'vicious cycle' pathogenetic hypothesis: summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; R Geoffrey Burwell; Peter H Dangerfield
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-10-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.