Literature DB >> 1536009

Rib hump and supine angle as prognostic factors for mild scoliosis.

G Duval-Beaupère1.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted on 262 patients with minor idiopathic scoliosis, having supine angles of less than 30 degrees and rib humps of less than 30 mm at the first examination. The initial radiographic measurement of the Cobb supine angle and rib hump height, recorded during a bending test performed on subjects in a sitting position, was correlated with the rate of scoliosis progression. Scoliosis progression was estimated graphically from an angle diagram established by monitoring untreated patients for 7 months to several years, depending on the rate of progression before treatment. More than 95% of the patients with initial supine angles of more than 17 degrees or rib humps greater than 11 mm suffered from progressive scoliosis. The importance of the size of the supine angle, rib-hump height, scoliotic pattern, and state of maturation for the progression rate are analyzed. Knowledge of these parameters can be used to make individual prognoses for approximately 95% of these subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1536009     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199201000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Time series spinal radiographs as prognostic factors for scoliosis and progression of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Hongfa Wu; Janet L Ronsky; Farida Cheriet; James Harder; Jessica C Küpper; Ronald F Zernicke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prediction of scoliosis progression with serial three-dimensional spinal curves and the artificial progression surface technique.

Authors:  Hongfa Wu; Janet L Ronsky; Farida Cheriet; Jessica Küpper; James Harder; Deyi Xue; Ronald F Zernicke
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Shear-wave elastography can evaluate annulus fibrosus alteration in adolescent scoliosis.

Authors:  Tristan Langlais; Claudio Vergari; Raphael Pietton; Jean Dubousset; Wafa Skalli; Raphael Vialle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Threshold values for supine and standing Cobb angles and rib hump measurements: prognostic factors for scoliosis.

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupere
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as developmental instability.

Authors:  C J Goldberg; F E Dowling; E E Fogarty; D P Moore
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Manuel Rigo; Hans Rudolf Weiss
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-04-10

7.  Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines).

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Stefano Negrini; Martha C Hawes; Manuel Rigo; Tomasz Kotwicki; Theodoros B Grivas; Toru Maruyama; Franz Landauer
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-05-08

8.  Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6th SOSORT consensus paper.

Authors:  Tomasz Kotwicki; Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas; Manuel Rigo; Toru Maruyama; Jacek Durmala; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-11-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.