Literature DB >> 8723474

Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

O Lortholary1, M Tod, N Rizzo, C Padoin, O Biard, P Casassus, L Guillevin, O Petitjean.   

Abstract

The teicoplanin pharmacokinetics (PK) of 30 febrile and severely neutropenic patients (polymorphonuclear count, < 500/mm3) with hematologic malignancies were compared with those determined for five healthy volunteers (HV). Neutropenic patients were given piperacillin combined with amikacin, and teicoplanin was added to the regimen the day fever developed in patients suspected of having a staphylococcal infection or 48 h later. Teicoplanin was given intravenously at a dosage of 6 mg/kg of body weight at 0, 12, and 24 h and once a day thereafter. Five to eleven blood samples per patient were collected. Teicoplanin concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography. A bicompartmental model was fitted to the data by a nonlinear mixed-effect-model approach. Multiple-linear regression analysis was applied in an attempt to correlate PK parameters to nine covariates. The mean trough concentrations of teicoplanin 48 h after the onset of treatment and 24 h after the last injection (last trough) +/- standard deviations were 8.8 +/- 4.1 and 17.5 +/- 13.5 mg/liter, respectively. A significant increase was noted in the mean rate of elimination clearance of teicoplanin in neutropenic patients compared with that of HV (0.86 versus 0.73 liter/h, P = 0.002), as was the case with rates of distribution clearance (5.89 versus 4.94 liter/h, P = 0.002); the mean half-life of distribution was significantly shorter in patients than in HV (0.43 versus 0.61 h, P = 0.002). In contrast, the volumes of the central compartment (ca. 5.8 liters for both groups), the volumes of distribution at steady state (HV, 37.6 liters; patients, 55.9 liters), and the elimination half-lives (HV, 39.6 h; patients, 52.7 h) were not significantly different between HV and neutropenic patients. Interindividual variabilities of rates of clearance (coefficient of variation [CV], 43%) and elimination half-lives (CV, 56%) were mainly explained by the variabilities among rates of creatinine clearance. Interindividual variabilities of the volumes of the central compartment (CV, 33%) and the volumes of distribution at steady state (CV = 51%) were correlated to interindividual variabilities among numbers of leukocytes and the ages of patients, respectively. On the basis of the population PK model of teicoplanin, simulations were made to optimize the dosing schedule. A supplemental 6 mg/kg dose of teicoplanin at 36 h resulted in a trough concentration at 48 h of 16.0 +/- 4.5 mg/liter, with only 7% of patients having a trough concentration of less than 10 mg/liter, compared with 46% of patients on the usual schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8723474      PMCID: PMC163299          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

1.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

2.  Effects of dosage, peak and trough concentrations in serum, protein binding, and bactericidal rate on efficacy of teicoplanin in a rabbit model of endocarditis.

Authors:  H F Chambers; S Kennedy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Gram-positive infections and the use of vancomycin in 550 episodes of fever and neutropenia.

Authors:  M Rubin; J W Hathorn; D Marshall; J Gress; S M Steinberg; P A Pizzo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  HPLC quantitation of the six main components of teicoplanin in biological fluids.

Authors:  F Jehl; H Monteil; A Tarral
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  A two-step iterative algorithm for estimation in nonlinear mixed-effect models with an evaluation in population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  F Mentré; R Gomeni
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  L Verbist; B Tjandramaga; B Hendrickx; A Van Hecken; P Van Melle; R Verbesselt; J Verhaegen; P J De Schepper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  M Rowland
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacokinetics of single- and multiple-dose teicoplanin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  P L Carver; C H Nightingale; R Quintiliani; K Sweeney; R C Stevens; E Maderazo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Evaluation of teicoplanin for treatment of endocarditis caused by gram-positive cocci in 20 patients.

Authors:  C Leport; C Perronne; P Massip; P Canton; P Leclercq; E Bernard; P Lutun; J J Garaud; J L Vilde
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of antibiotic diffusion into cardiac vegetations by quantitative autoradiography.

Authors:  A C Cremieux; B Maziere; J M Vallois; M Ottaviani; A Azancot; H Raffoul; A Bouvet; J J Pocidalo; C Carbon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Randomized comparison of serum teicoplanin concentrations following daily or alternate daily dosing in healthy adults.

Authors:  Bernard Rouveix; François Jehl; Henri Drugeon; Ivan Brumpt; Evelyne Caulin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Management of antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Francisco Álvarez-Lerma; Santiago Grau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Population pharmacokinetic study of amikacin administered once or twice daily to febrile, severely neutropenic adults.

Authors:  M Tod; O Lortholary; D Seytre; R Semaoun; B Uzzan; L Guillevin; P Casassus; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Tiphaine Goulenok; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Ceftazidime in acute myeloid leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia: helpfulness of continuous intravenous infusion in maximizing pharmacodynamic exposure.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Daniela Damiani; Federica Pavan; Francesco Cristini; Renato Fanin; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Anna Candoni; Federica Pavan; Leonardo Pagani; Daniela Damiani; Marco Casini; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in critically ill patients without vasopressors.

Authors:  A Barbot; N Venisse; F Rayeh; S Bouquet; B Debaene; O Mimoz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.