Literature DB >> 16176116

Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Federico Pea1, Pierluigi Viale, Mario Furlanut.   

Abstract

Antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of critically ill patients. Selecting the appropriate antimicrobial at the commencement of therapy, both in terms of spectrum of activity and dose and frequency of administration according to concentration or time dependency, is mandatory in this setting. Despite appropriate standard dosage regimens, failure of the antimicrobial treatment may occur because of the inability of the antimicrobial to achieve adequate concentrations at the infection site through alterations in its pharmacokinetics due to underlying pathophysiological conditions. According to the intrinsic chemicophysical properties of antimicrobials, hydrophilic antimicrobials (beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides) have to be considered at much higher risk of inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variations than lipophilic antimicrobials (macrolides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, rifampicin [rifampin]) in critically ill patients, with significant frequent fluctuations of plasma concentrations that may require significant dosage adjustments. For example, underexposure may occur because of increased volume of distribution (as a result of oedema in sepsis and trauma, pleural effusion, ascites, mediastinitis, fluid therapy or indwelling post-surgical drainage) and/or enhanced renal clearance (as a result of burns, drug abuse, hyperdynamic conditions during sepsis, acute leukaemia or use of haemodynamically active drugs). On the other hand, overexposure may occur because of a drop in renal clearance caused by renal impairment. Care with all these factors whenever choosing an antimicrobial may substantially improve the outcome of antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients. However, since these situations may often coexist in the same patient and pharmacokinetic variability may be unpredictable, the antimicrobial policy may further benefit from real-time application of therapeutic drug monitoring, since this practice, by tailoring exposure to the individual patient, may consequently be helpful both in improving the outcome of antimicrobial therapy and in containing the spread of resistance in the hospital setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176116     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544100-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  201 in total

Review 1.  Septic shock: pathogenesis.

Authors:  M P Glauser; G Zanetti; J D Baumgartner; J Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-09-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Cardiovascular and renal hemodynamic effects of intravenous infusions of the selective DA1 agonist, fenoldopam, used alone or in combination with dopamine and dobutamine.

Authors:  N A Lass; D Glock; L I Goldberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Rational empiric antibiotic prescription in the ICU.

Authors:  N Singh; V L Yu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Low plasma cefepime levels in critically ill septic patients: pharmacokinetic modeling indicates improved troughs with revised dosing.

Authors:  J Lipman; S C Wallis; C Rickard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  S Kaojarern; S Maoleekoonpairoj; V Atichartakarn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Cefepime versus cefpirome: the importance of creatinine clearance.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lipman; Steven C Wallis; Robert J Boots
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Effect of once-daily dosing vs. multiple daily dosing of tobramycin on enzyme markers of nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Keith M Olsen; Maria I Rudis; Jill A Rebuck; Jill Hara; Dave Gelmont; Ramin Mehdian; Casey Nelson; Mark E Rupp
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Simplified dosing and monitoring of vancomycin for the burn care clinician.

Authors:  T L Rice
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.744

10.  Urinary bactericidal activity, urinary excretion and plasma concentrations of gatifloxacin (400 mg) versus ciprofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers after a single oral dose.

Authors:  Dieter Boy; Michaela Well; Martina Kinzig-Schippers; Fritz Sörgel; Dorothe Ankel-Fuchs; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.283

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  Management of antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Francisco Álvarez-Lerma; Santiago Grau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Predictors of insufficient amikacin peak concentration in critically ill patients receiving a 25 mg/kg total body weight regimen.

Authors:  Etienne de Montmollin; Lila Bouadma; Nathalie Gault; Bruno Mourvillier; Eric Mariotte; Sarah Chemam; Laurent Massias; Emmanuelle Papy; Florence Tubach; Michel Wolff; Romain Sonneville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Prudent use of antimicrobial prophylaxis : Prevention of increasing antibiotic resistance].

Authors:  C Hein; A Pilatz; F M E Wagenlehner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Authors:  Mathias W Pletz; Frank Bloos; Olaf Burkhardt; Frank M Brunkhorst; Stefanie M Bode-Böger; Jens Martens-Lobenhoffer; Mark W Greer; Heino Stass; Tobias Welte
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Pharmacokinetics of unbound linezolid in plasma and tissue interstitium of critically ill patients after multiple dosing using microdialysis.

Authors:  Cornelia Buerger; Nele Plock; Pejman Dehghanyar; Christian Joukhadar; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Substantial Impact of Altered Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients on the Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem Evaluated via the Dynamic Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Phillip J Bergen; Jürgen B Bulitta; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Kate E Rogers; Megan J McGregor; Steven C Wallis; David L Paterson; Roger L Nation; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic considerations for antimicrobial therapy in patients receiving renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Federica Pavan; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Should the currently recommended twice-daily dosing still be considered the most appropriate regimen for treating MRSA ventilator-associated pneumonia with vancomycin?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Tissue accumulation of cephalothin in burns: a comparative study by microdialysis of subcutaneous interstitial fluid cephalothin concentrations in burn patients and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Andrew J Dalley; Jeffrey Lipman; Renae Deans; Bala Venkatesh; Michael Rudd; Michael S Roberts; Sheree E Cross
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacokinetics of linezolid in septic patients with and without extended dialysis.

Authors:  Stefanie Swoboda; Michael C Ober; Christoph Lichtenstern; Soundos Saleh; Vedat Schwenger; Hans-Günther Sonntag; Walter Emil Haefeli; Georg Hempel; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Markus A Weigand
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.