Literature DB >> 15215086

Randomized comparison of serum teicoplanin concentrations following daily or alternate daily dosing in healthy adults.

Bernard Rouveix1, François Jehl, Henri Drugeon, Ivan Brumpt, Evelyne Caulin.   

Abstract

Trough serum teicoplanin concentrations were compared in healthy adults following intravenous administration of one of two regimens: (i) 12 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h for 3 doses and then 15 mg/kg every 48 h for 4 doses (n = 16 subjects) or (ii) 6 mg/kg every 12 h for 2 doses and then 6 mg/kg every 24 h for 9 doses (n = 8 subjects). The mean +/- standard deviation trough concentrations in serum on day 11 (24 and 48 h after administration of the last dose for the daily and alternate-day dosing schedules, respectively) were 16.0 +/- 2.1 and 17.9 +/- 3.5 mg/liter for subjects receiving the two regimens, respectively, by a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The limits of the 95% confidence interval of the difference (-0.2, 3.6 mg/liter) determined by a nonparametric test were situated above the -1.3-mg/liter maximum set difference and indicated a noninferiority of the alternate-day dosing to the daily dosing. Throughout the study the individual trough concentrations in serum in the alternate-day dosing group constantly exceeded 10 mg/liter, the presently recommended target concentration for the treatment of severe infections. The trough concentrations in the sera of all subjects were bactericidal for six Staphylococcus aureus strains for which teicoplanin MICs are between 0.5 and 4 mg/liter. The bactericidal activity of serum was related to total teicoplanin (protein bound and unbound). In conclusion, an alternate-day dosing schedule (15 mg/kg on alternate days following administration of a 12-mg/kg loading dose three times every 12 h) could be considered for further efficacy and safety studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15215086      PMCID: PMC434169          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2394-2399.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  15 in total

1.  Teicoplanin therapy for Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia: relationship between pre-dose serum concentrations and outcome.

Authors:  I Harding; A P MacGowan; L O White; E S Darley; V Reed
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin and vancomycin.

Authors:  I Harding; F Sorgel
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.714

5.  Management of serious staphylococcal infections in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  W Graninger; E Presterl; C Wenisch; E Schwameis; S Breyer; T Vukovich
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Three-times weekly teicoplanin in the outpatient treatment of acute methicillin-resistant staphylococcal osteomyelitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  L Lazzarini; A Tramarin; L Bragagnolo; G Tositti; V Manfrin; Lalla F de
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.714

7.  Teicoplanin binding in plasma following administration of increasing intravenous doses to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Bernareggi; M Borgonovi; A Del Favero; R Rosina; L Gavanaghi
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 8.  Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic drug monitoring of glycopeptides.

Authors:  A P MacGowan
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Comparative effect of protein binding on the killing activities of teicoplanin and vancomycin.

Authors:  E M Bailey; M J Rybak; G W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Protein binding and serum bactericidal activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin.

Authors:  R S Dykhuizen; G Harvey; N Stephenson; D Nathwani; I M Gould
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  2 in total

1.  Antibiotic prophylaxis with teicoplanin on alternate days reduces rate of viridans sepsis and febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Heidrun Boztug; Nora Mühlegger; Ulrike Pötschger; Andishe Attarbaschi; Christina Peters; Georg Mann; Michael Dworzak
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.673

2.  Evaluation of a thrice weekly administration of teicoplanin in the outpatient setting: a retrospective observational multicentre study.

Authors:  John Asumang; Katie L Heard; Oliver Troise; Sandra Fahmy; Nabeela Mughal; Luke S P Moore; Stephen Hughes
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-02-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.