Literature DB >> 3337513

Gram-positive infections and the use of vancomycin in 550 episodes of fever and neutropenia.

M Rubin1, J W Hathorn, D Marshall, J Gress, S M Steinberg, P A Pizzo.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriate role for vancomycin in neutropenic patients with cancer. To review the incidence, types, and outcome of gram-positive infections in a series of neutropenic patients with cancer.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Inpatient units of the Medical and Pediatric Oncology Branches of the National Cancer Institute. PATIENTS: Five hundred and fifty consecutive episodes of fever and neutropenia in patients with cancer randomized prospectively on another study to receive either ceftazidime alone or combination antibiotics for initial empirical therapy. INTERVENTION: Intravenous vancomycin (dosage adjusted by serum levels).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gram-positive organisms were the commonest of the bacterial pathogens isolated (63%). Of the 53 gram-positive organisms accounting for primary infections (isolated at initial presentation), there were 36 staphylococcal isolates (19 coagulase-negative and 17 coagulase-positive), 13 streptococcal isolates (8 non-group D and 5 group D), and 4 polymicrobial isolates. Of the 22 secondary gram-positive infections (occurring after institution of initial antibiotics), there were 10 streptococcal isolates (9 group D and 1 non-group D), 7 staphylococcal isolates (6 coagulase-negative and 1 coagulase-positive), and 5 polymicrobial isolates. Vancomycin was used to treat 26 of the 53 primary infections, but was begun only after knowledge of the isolate in 25. Vancomycin was used to treat 17 of the 22 secondary infections, and begun only after knowledge of the isolate in 14. This approach resulted in no treatment failures for the primary infections, and a single microbiological failure for the secondary infections. There was a tendency towards a greater proportion of secondary gram-positive infections in the monotherapy group compared to the combination therapy group (16 of 282 compared with 6 of 268 respectively, P2 = 0.04 by the chi-squared test); but all were treated successfully.
CONCLUSION: Vancomycin need not be included in routine empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients, but should be added when clinical or microbiological data suggest the need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3337513     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-1-30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  43 in total

1.  Staphylococcus aureus, Platelets, and the Heart.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Withholding initial vancomycin in febrile neutropenia despite implanted catheters.

Authors:  Christoph Berger; Karin Kindli; Felix K Niggli; David Nadal
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Comparison of two antibiotic regimens (piperacillin plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin) as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Authors:  J Feliu; A Artal; M González Barón; A Berrocal; I Chacón; M L García de Paredes; E Espinosa; A Ordóñez; P Zamora; J M Montero
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Resistance of enterococci to glycopeptides.

Authors:  P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Open randomized study of cefepime versus piperacillin-gentamicin for treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  D Yamamura; R Gucalp; P Carlisle; M Cimino; J Roberts; C Rotstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Empiric treatment of infection during granulocytopenia: a comprehensive approach.

Authors:  J Klastersky
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Patterns and outcome of septicemia in neutropenic children with cancer in a Greek hospital.

Authors:  E Roilides; V Sidi; N Gompakis; M Tsivitanidou; A Katsaveli; D Koliouskas
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Three-step empiric treatment for severely neutropenic patients with fever: ceftazidime--vancomycin--amphotericin B.

Authors:  H Koeppler; K H Pflueger; R Seitz; K Havemann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Evaluation of penicillin G in the prevention of streptococcal septicaemia in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  P de Jong; M de Jong; E Kuijper; J van der Lelie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.