A Barbot1, N Venisse, F Rayeh, S Bouquet, B Debaene, O Mimoz. 1. Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Cité de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers Cedex, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in the plasma of surgical intensive care unit patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, crossover study in the surgical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with a suspected nosocomial infection, a serum albumin level higher than 10 g/l, body mass index less than 28 kg/m(2), and estimated creatinine clearance higher than 70 ml/min. INTERVENTIONS:Teicoplanin was first administered intravenously as a loading dose of 6 mg/kg per 12 h for 48 h and then continued at a daily dose of 6 mg/kg. On the fourth day patients were randomized in two groups according to the order of the pharmacokinetic studies. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Serial plasma samples were obtained to measure teicoplanin levels. Compared with a 30-min intravenous infusion the peak concentration of teicoplanin after a 30-min subcutaneous administration occurred later (median 7 h, range 5-18) and was lower (16 micro g/ml, 9-31; vs. 73, 53-106). Despite large and unpredictable interindividual differences no significant differences between subcutaneous and intravenous administration were observed in: trough antibiotic concentrations (10 micro g/ml, 6-24; vs. 9, 5-30), the area under the teicoplanin plasma concentration vs. time curves from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24h); 309 micro g/ml per minute, 180-640; vs. 369, 171-955), the proportion of the dosing interval during which the plasma teicoplanin concentration exceeded 10 micro g/ml (96%, 0-100%; vs. 79%, 13-100%), and the ratio of AUC(0-24h) to 10 (77, 45-160; vs. 92, 43-239). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients without vasopressors a switch to the subcutaneous teicoplanin after an initial intravenous therapy seems to give comparable pharmacodynamic indexes of therapeutic success.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in the plasma of surgical intensive care unit patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, crossover study in the surgical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with a suspected nosocomial infection, a serum albumin level higher than 10 g/l, body mass index less than 28 kg/m(2), and estimated creatinine clearance higher than 70 ml/min. INTERVENTIONS:Teicoplanin was first administered intravenously as a loading dose of 6 mg/kg per 12 h for 48 h and then continued at a daily dose of 6 mg/kg. On the fourth day patients were randomized in two groups according to the order of the pharmacokinetic studies. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Serial plasma samples were obtained to measure teicoplanin levels. Compared with a 30-min intravenous infusion the peak concentration of teicoplanin after a 30-min subcutaneous administration occurred later (median 7 h, range 5-18) and was lower (16 micro g/ml, 9-31; vs. 73, 53-106). Despite large and unpredictable interindividual differences no significant differences between subcutaneous and intravenous administration were observed in: trough antibiotic concentrations (10 micro g/ml, 6-24; vs. 9, 5-30), the area under the teicoplanin plasma concentration vs. time curves from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24h); 309 micro g/ml per minute, 180-640; vs. 369, 171-955), the proportion of the dosing interval during which the plasma teicoplanin concentration exceeded 10 micro g/ml (96%, 0-100%; vs. 79%, 13-100%), and the ratio of AUC(0-24h) to 10 (77, 45-160; vs. 92, 43-239). CONCLUSIONS: In critically illpatients without vasopressors a switch to the subcutaneous teicoplanin after an initial intravenous therapy seems to give comparable pharmacodynamic indexes of therapeutic success.
Authors: O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: J L Vincent; D J Bihari; P M Suter; H A Bruining; J White; M H Nicolas-Chanoin; M Wolff; R C Spencer; M Hemmer Journal: JAMA Date: 1995 Aug 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoît Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 17.440