Literature DB >> 12856119

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in critically ill patients without vasopressors.

A Barbot1, N Venisse, F Rayeh, S Bouquet, B Debaene, O Mimoz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in the plasma of surgical intensive care unit patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective, randomized, crossover study in the surgical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with a suspected nosocomial infection, a serum albumin level higher than 10 g/l, body mass index less than 28 kg/m(2), and estimated creatinine clearance higher than 70 ml/min.
INTERVENTIONS: Teicoplanin was first administered intravenously as a loading dose of 6 mg/kg per 12 h for 48 h and then continued at a daily dose of 6 mg/kg. On the fourth day patients were randomized in two groups according to the order of the pharmacokinetic studies. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Serial plasma samples were obtained to measure teicoplanin levels. Compared with a 30-min intravenous infusion the peak concentration of teicoplanin after a 30-min subcutaneous administration occurred later (median 7 h, range 5-18) and was lower (16 micro g/ml, 9-31; vs. 73, 53-106). Despite large and unpredictable interindividual differences no significant differences between subcutaneous and intravenous administration were observed in: trough antibiotic concentrations (10 micro g/ml, 6-24; vs. 9, 5-30), the area under the teicoplanin plasma concentration vs. time curves from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24h); 309 micro g/ml per minute, 180-640; vs. 369, 171-955), the proportion of the dosing interval during which the plasma teicoplanin concentration exceeded 10 micro g/ml (96%, 0-100%; vs. 79%, 13-100%), and the ratio of AUC(0-24h) to 10 (77, 45-160; vs. 92, 43-239).
CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients without vasopressors a switch to the subcutaneous teicoplanin after an initial intravenous therapy seems to give comparable pharmacodynamic indexes of therapeutic success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12856119     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1859-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  23 in total

1.  Increasing prevalence of methicillin resistance amongst Staphylococcus aureus blood culture isolates.

Authors:  A P Johnson; D James; D M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Co-amoxiclav pharmacokinetics during posttraumatic hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  O Mimoz; V Schaeffer; P Incagnoli; K Louchahi; A Edouard; O Petitjean; M Tod
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  [Therapeutic monitoring of teicoplanin in a severely burned patient].

Authors:  A Lesne-Hulin; P Bourget; H Le Bever; P Ainaud; H Carsin
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  1997

5.  Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Binding of teicoplanin to human serum albumin.

Authors:  A Assandri; A Bernareggi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics during iatrogenic hydroxyethyl starch-induced hypoalbuminemia: a model to explore the effects of decreased protein binding capacity on highly bound drugs.

Authors:  O Mimoz; S Soreda; C Padoin; M Tod; O Petitjean; D Benhamou
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Nosocomial bloodstream infections: organisms, risk factors, and implications.

Authors:  A W Karchmer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in critically ill patients.

Authors:  R van Dalen; T B Vree
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee.

Authors:  J L Vincent; D J Bihari; P M Suter; H A Bruining; J White; M H Nicolas-Chanoin; M Wolff; R C Spencer; M Hemmer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine-2003. Part 1: Respiratory failure, infection and sepsis.

Authors:  Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoît Vallet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic considerations for antimicrobial therapy in patients receiving renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Federica Pavan; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Clinical implications of antibiotic pharmacokinetic principles in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem following intravenous and subcutaneous infusions in patients.

Authors:  Denis Frasca; Sandrine Marchand; Franck Petitpas; Claire Dahyot-Fizelier; William Couet; Olivier Mimoz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Proposal of a pharmacokinetically optimized dosage regimen of antibiotics in patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Takehito Yamamoto; Nobuhiro Yasuno; Shoichi Katada; Akihiro Hisaka; Norio Hanafusa; Eisei Noiri; Naoki Yahagi; Toshiro Fujita; Hiroshi Suzuki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  High-dose continuous oxacillin infusion results in achievement of pharmacokinetics targets in critically ill patients with deep sternal wound infections following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Nicolas Nesseler; Marie-Clémence Verdier; Yoann Launey; Alexandre Malherbe; Marine Dermu; Caroline Piau; Erwan Flécher; Olivier Tribut; Yannick Mallédant; Philippe Seguin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The clinical relevance of plasma protein binding changes.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Federico Pea; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Tolerability and Plasma Drug Level Monitoring of Prolonged Subcutaneous Teicoplanin Treatment for Bone and Joint Infections.

Authors:  Youssef El Samad; Jean-Philippe Lanoix; Youssef Bennis; Momar Diouf; Carlo Saroufim; Benoit Brunschweiler; Florence Rousseau; Cédric Joseph; Farida Hamdad; Mohamed Ait Amer Meziane; Simon Routier; Jean-Luc Schmit
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock--does the dose matter?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.