Literature DB >> 8692425

Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

R J Bartlett1, C A Hill, R Devlin, E D Gardiner.   

Abstract

A prospective comparison was made of standard two-dimensional MRI sequences, at both high and midfield strength, with CT myelography in 23 patients with cervical spondylosis. MRI is adequate for assessment of cord compression, where high field strength is superior to midfield strength. MRI using 4-mm sections is inadequate for presurgical assessment of root compression. It remains to be proven whether thin-section white-CSF volume sequences or gadolinium-enhanced volume studies can replace CT myelography.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8692425     DOI： 10.1007/bf00604801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN： 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  D M Yousem; S W Atlas; H I Goldberg; R I Grossman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; P R McCowin; D O Davis; T S Dina; A S Mark; S Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  MRI in cervical disk herniation.

Authors:  P H Nakstad; J K Hald; S J Bakke; I O Skalpe; J Wiberg
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Gradient echo (GRASS) MR imaging in cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  M C Hedberg; B P Drayer; R A Flom; J A Hodak; C R Bird
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disk herniation. Pre- and postoperative findings.

Authors:  E M Larsson; S Holtås; S Cronqvist; L Brandt
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Diagnosis of cervical disc disease. MRI versus cervical myelography.

Authors:  G Perneczky; F W Böck; A Neuhold; M Stiskal
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  J S Tsuruda; K Remley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  3D MRI of the cervical spine: low flip angle FISP vs. Gd-DTPA TurboFLASH in degenerative disk disease.

Authors:  J S Ross; P M Ruggieri; M Glicklich; N Obuchowski; J Dillinger; T J Masaryk; Y Qu; M T Modic
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.

Authors:  M G Karnaze; M H Gado; K J Sartor; F J Hodges
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  D W Wilson; R T Pezzuti; J N Place
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.654
  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Sidney M Rubinstein; Jan J M Pool; Maurits W van Tulder; Ingrid I Riphagen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  Paula Martin-Vaquero; Ronaldo C da Costa; Wm Tod Drost
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.363
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.