Literature DB >> 2594180

MRI in cervical disk herniation.

P H Nakstad1, J K Hald, S J Bakke, I O Skalpe, J Wiberg.   

Abstract

Eleven operated herniated disks in 10 patients were evaluated preoperatively with plain films, myelography and magnetic resonance imaging. Plain X-ray was a valuable supplement to MRI for studying the bony changes. Myelography showed 7 of 11 herniated disks while MRI gave correct diagnosis in all. It is concluded that MRI can replace myelography and computerized tomography in the preoperative evaluation of cervical herniated disk. The other examinations may be supplementary in some cases.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2594180     DOI： 10.1007/bf00343860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN： 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  15 in total

1.  Myelographic cervical nerve root deformities.

Authors:  A J Fox; J P Lin; R S Pinto; I I Kricheff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Emergency magnetic resonance examination of patients with spinal cord symptoms.

Authors:  E M Larsson; S Holtås; S Cronqvist
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Oblique plane MR imaging of the cervical spine.

Authors:  D O Yenerich; V M Haughton
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Myelographic findings in cervical spines without degenerative changes. Special reference to sagittal diameter of the dural sac.

Authors:  P Nakstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Cord shape and measurements in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Y L Yu; J M Stevens; B Kendall; G H du Boulay
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Cervical disk herniation: CT demonstration after contrast enhancement.

Authors:  E J Russell; C M D'Angelo; R D Zimmerman; L F Czervionke; M S Huckman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Functional cervical myelography with iohexol.

Authors:  P Nakstad; O Aaserud; T Ganes; R Nyberg-Hansen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Cervical radiculopathy: computed tomography and myelography compared.

Authors:  D L Daniels; J P Grogan; J G Johansen; G A Meyer; A L Williams; V M Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Cervical myelopathy: a comparison of magnetic resonance and myelography.

Authors:  T J Masaryk; M T Modic; M A Geisinger; J Standefer; R W Hardy; F Boumphrey; P M Duchesneau
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Myelography with iohexol (Omnipaque); a clinical report with special reference to the adverse effects.

Authors:  I O Skalpe; P Nakstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804
View more
  4 in total

1.  Combined use of spin-echo and gradient-echo MR-imaging in cervical disk disease. Comparison with myelography and intraoperative findings.

Authors:  A Neuhold; M Stiskal; C Platzer; G Pernecky; M Brainin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  R J Bartlett; C A Hill; R Devlin; E D Gardiner
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Comparing the cost of spinal MR with conventional myelography and radiculography.

Authors:  G H du Boulay; S Hawkes; C C Lee; B A Teather; D Teather
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Diagnosis of cervical disc disease. MRI versus cervical myelography.

Authors:  G Perneczky; F W Böck; A Neuhold; M Stiskal
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.