Literature DB >> 17013656

A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy.

Sidney M Rubinstein1, Jan J M Pool, Maurits W van Tulder, Ingrid I Riphagen, Henrica C W de Vet.   

Abstract

Clinical provocative tests of the neck, which position the neck and arm inorder to aggravate or relieve arm symptoms, are commonly used in clinical practice in patients with a suspected cervical radiculopathy. Their diagnostic accuracy, however, has never been examined in a systematic review. A comprehensive search was conducted in order to identify all possible studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A study was included if: (1) any provocative test of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy was identified; (2) any reference standard was used; (3) sensitivity and specificity were reported or could be (re-)calculated; and, (4) the publication was a full report. Two reviewers independently selected studies, and assessed methodological quality. Only six studies met the inclusion criteria, which evaluated five provocative tests. In general, Spurling's test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and high specificity, as did traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's maneuver. The upper limb tension test (ULTT) demonstrated high sensitivity and low specificity, while the shoulder abduction test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and moderate to high specificity. Common methodological flaws included lack of an optimal reference standard, disease progression bias, spectrum bias, and review bias. Limitations include few primary studies, substantial heterogeneity, and numerous methodological flaws among the studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not conducted. This review suggests that, when consistent with the history and other physical findings, a positive Spurling's, traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's might be indicative of a cervical radiculopathy, while a negative ULTT might be used to rule it out. However, the lack of evidence precludes any firm conclusions regarding their diagnostic value, especially when used in primary care. More high quality studies are necessary in order to resolve this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17013656      PMCID: PMC2200707          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  54 in total

1.  Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: reducing the number needed to read.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Reto Coray; Pius Estermann; Gerben Ter Riet
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Electrodiagnosis of neck pain.

Authors:  Jay J Han; George H Kraft
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.784

3.  The Spurling test and cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Henry C Tong; Andrew J Haig; Karen Yamakawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  R J Bartlett; C A Hill; R Devlin; E D Gardiner
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  The shoulder abduction relief sign in cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  A Fast; S Parikh; E L Marin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The clinical significance of straight-leg raising (Lasègue's sign) in the diagnosis of prolapsed lumbar disc. Interobserver variation and correlation with surgical finding.

Authors:  M Kosteljanetz; F Bang; S Schmidt-Olsen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The human cervical myotomes: an anatomical correlation between electromyography and CT/myelography.

Authors:  M B Katirji; R Agrawal; T A Kantra
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990.

Authors:  K Radhakrishnan; W J Litchy; W M O'Fallon; L T Kurland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Cervical radiculopathy: prospective evaluation with surface coil MR imaging, CT with metrizamide, and metrizamide myelography.

Authors:  M T Modic; T J Masaryk; G P Mulopulos; C Bundschuh; J S Han; H Bohlman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Noninvasive discrimination of brachial plexus involvement in upper limb pain.

Authors:  P J Selvaratnam; T A Matyas; E F Glasgow
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  41 in total

1.  The cardiac cycle and the effects of neurohumors on myocardial contractility in the Asiatic eel Anguilla japonica, Timm. & Schle.

Authors:  P H Chow; D K Chan
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol       Date:  1975-10-01

2.  Conservative management of uncomplicated mechanical neck pain in a military aviator.

Authors:  Bart N Green; Andrew S Dunn; Solomon M Pearce; Claire D Johnson
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset neck pain or cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Per Kjaer; Alice Kongsted; Jan Hartvigsen; Alexander Isenberg-Jørgensen; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen; Bolette Søborg; Charlotte Krog; Christian Martin Møller; Christine Marie Bækø Halling; Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Inge Ris Hansen; Jesper Nørregaard; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Lars Valentin Hansen; Marie Jakobsen; Martin Bach Jensen; Martin Melbye; Peter Duel; Steffan W Christensen; Tina Myung Povlsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical radiculopathy combined with cervical myelopathy: prevalence and characteristics.

Authors:  Byung-Wan Choi; Sung-Soo Kim; Dong-Hyun Lee; Ji-Wan Kim
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-15

6.  Abduction extension cervical nerve root stress test: anatomical basis and clinical relevance.

Authors:  M Farshad; K Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The painful shoulder: an update on assessment, treatment, and referral.

Authors:  Majid Artus; Tim A Holt; Jonathan Rees
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  An investigation of somatosensory profiles in work related upper limb disorders: a case-control observational study protocol.

Authors:  Niamh Moloney; Toby Hall; Catherine Doody
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Motor unit potential morphology differences in individuals with non-specific arm pain and lateral epicondylitis.

Authors:  Kristina M Calder; Daniel W Stashuk; Linda McLean
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Reliability of clinical tests to evaluate nerve function and mechanosensitivity of the upper limb peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  Annina B Schmid; Florian Brunner; Hannu Luomajoki; Ulrike Held; Lucas M Bachmann; Sabine Künzer; Michel W Coppieters
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.