Literature DB >> 2736175

Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disk herniation. Pre- and postoperative findings.

E M Larsson1, S Holtås, S Cronqvist, L Brandt.   

Abstract

Twenty-six patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy caused by spondylosis or disk herniation were examined with myelography, CT myelography and MR. Fourteen of the patients were operated upon and 11 of them underwent postoperative MR and CT. The three radiologic methods provided comparable information about narrowing of the subarachnoid space and compression of the spinal cord. It was more difficult to distinguish bone from soft tissue with MR only, but the combination of MR and conventional radiography gave sufficient information for this differentiation. When radiologic nerve root sheath deformity was compared with clinical radiculopathy, myelography, CT myelography and MR had similar sensitivity and accuracy. Postoperative MR could reveal remaining indentation on the thecal sac and the cord but CT without contrast medium was useful as a complement to determine the aetiology of the indentation. Because MR has several practical advantages, it is well suited as the primary imaging modality, together with conventional radiography, for the preoperative radiologic evaluation of patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Postoperative MR is useful in patients with persistent or new symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2736175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  14 in total

1.  Three-dimensional rotational myelography.

Authors:  Markus Kufeld; Benjamin Claus; Adriana Campi; Wolfgang R Lanksch; Goetz Benndorf
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Qualitative assessment of cervical spinal stenosis: observer variability on CT and MR images.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stafira; Jagadeesh R Sonnad; William T C Yuh; David R Huard; Robin E Acker; Dan L Nguyen; Joan E Maley; Faridali G Ramji; Wen-Bin Li; Christopher M Loftus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatology.

Authors:  C W Heron
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Sidney M Rubinstein; Jan J M Pool; Maurits W van Tulder; Ingrid I Riphagen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  MRI in the management of suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  P F Statham; D M Hadley; P Macpherson; R A Johnston; I Bone; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  R J Bartlett; C A Hill; R Devlin; E D Gardiner
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography.

Authors:  J Reul; B Gievers; J Weis; A Thron
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  Paula Martin-Vaquero; Ronaldo C da Costa; Wm Tod Drost
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.363

10.  Usefulness of MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of cervical disk herniation.

Authors:  T Kuroki; K Kumano; S Hirabayashi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.