Literature DB >> 8666954

Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

U Castiello1.   

Abstract

This study used a natural task, with no emphasis placed on speeded responses, to investigate unconscious information processing. Using the ELITE system, a kinematic analysis was performed of the upper limb reach-to-grasp movement. Nine experiments explored how the presence of distractors affects the transport and grasp component of this movement. Experiment 1 showed that the kinematics for grasping apples, mandarins, cherries, and bananas were measurably different. Experiments 2A-D, 3, and 4 showed that these kinematics were not affected by the presence of nearby distractor fruits of either the same or a different kind. In Experiment 5, interference effects became evident when participants were required to perform a subsidiary task involving the distractor (counting the number of times a laterally placed fruit was illuminated). Experiment 6, requiring both grasping a target fruit and counting the number of times that this fruit was illuminated, revealed no interference effects. Taken together, these results suggest that selection for action does not involve substantial passive processing of distractors. However, dual-action processing of simultaneously presented objects does appear to involve automatic processing of even the task-irrelevant properties of the distractor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8666954     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.3.582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  45 in total

1.  Dopaminergic effects on the implicit processing of distractor objects in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Bonfiglioli; R F Peppard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of terminal action requirements on action-centered distractor effects.

Authors:  P L Weir; D J Weeks; T N Welsh; D Elliott; R Chua; E A Roy; J Lyons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasping the meaning of words.

Authors:  Scott Glover; David A Rosenbaum; Jeremy Graham; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Umberto Castiello; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

5.  Sequential actions: effects of upcoming perceptual and motor tasks on current actions.

Authors:  Kevin A LeBlanc; David A Westwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  An object-centred reference frame for control of grasping: effects of grasping a distractor object on visuomotor control.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Patrick Haggard; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  On the relations between affordance and representation of the agent's effector.

Authors:  Filippo Barbieri; Antimo Buonocore; Paolo Bernardis; Riccardo Dalla Volta; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Veronica Tognin; Luca Turella; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control.

Authors:  Geniva Liu; Romeo Chua; James T Enns
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The context dependence of grasping movements: an evaluation of possible reasons.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.