Literature DB >> 12610689

Influence of terminal action requirements on action-centered distractor effects.

P L Weir1, D J Weeks, T N Welsh, D Elliott, R Chua, E A Roy, J Lyons.   

Abstract

Tipper (1985; Q J Exp Psychol A 37:571-590) has suggested that competing responses programmed to distracting stimuli are inhibited based on their relationship to the action being performed. The present paper reports two experiments designed to examine the influence of the terminal action of a task on the allocation of visual attention. Taken together the results suggest that when engaging targets in an environment, which includes distracting stimuli, competing responses are likely to be programmed in parallel and that the relationship between competing responses can include both spatial position and action characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12610689     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1358-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

1.  Hand deviations toward distractors. Evidence for response competition.

Authors:  T N Welsh; D Elliott; D J Weeks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Semantic category interference effects upon the reach-to-grasp movement.

Authors:  C Jervis; K Bennett; J Thomas; S Lim; U Castiello
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Interference from distractors in reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  A Kritikos; K M Bennett; J Dunai; U Castiello
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-02

Review 4.  One more cup of coffee for the road: object-action assemblies, response blocking and response capture after frontal lobe damage.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; M J Riddoch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; C Lortie; G C Baylis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects.

Authors:  D V Meegan; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-05

7.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Features and objects: the fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1988-05

Review 9.  The role of position in object selection in vision.

Authors:  A H van der Heijden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

10.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; S B Kenny; M A Derr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Non-target flanker effects on movement in a virtual action centred reference frame.

Authors:  Sherilene M Carr; James G Phillips; James W Meehan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  No one knows what attention is.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Craig S Chapman; Paul Cisek; Heather F Neyedli; Joo-Hyun Song; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.