Literature DB >> 18008067

Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control.

Geniva Liu1, Romeo Chua, James T Enns.   

Abstract

Human vision allows us both to perceive our surroundings (e.g., identify a cup) and to interact with them (e.g., reach for a cup). It is generally accepted that these functions are supported by a ventral system for conscious object identification and a dorsal system for unconscious control of action, but little research has addressed the extent to which these two systems can operate concurrently. We show that the identification of one object interferes with the planning of a pointing action to a second object, but does not interfere with the visually guided control required to complete the action. This lack of interference holds even for actions that must be modified in response to a dynamically changing scene. These findings support the proposal that the planning of action shares resources with conscious tasks of perception, but that the online control of already-initiated actions does not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18008067     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1196-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Manual asymmetries in reaching movement control. I: Study of right-handers.

Authors:  P Boulinguez; V Nougier; J L Velay
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  V H Franz; K R Gegenfurtner; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

3.  Visual awareness and the on-line modification of action.

Authors:  J H Fecteau; R Chua; I Franks; J T Enns
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-06

4.  Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches.

Authors:  Joel Norman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Task-irrelevant visual motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink.

Authors:  Isabel Arend; Stephen Johnston; Kimron Shapiro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

8.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus.

Authors:  D Pélisson; C Prablanc; M A Goodale; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  An unusual enhancement of motor performance during bimanual movement in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  R G Brown; M Jahanshahi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  9 in total

1.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Heidi Long; Anna Ma-Wyatt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Ever-ready for action: Spatial effects on motor system excitability.

Authors:  Matthieu M de Wit; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  The inevitable contrast: Conscious vs. unconscious processes in action control.

Authors:  Ezequiel Morsella; T Andrew Poehlman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-10

5.  The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  The olfactory system as the gateway to the neural correlates of consciousness.

Authors:  Christina Merrick; Christine A Godwin; Mark W Geisler; Ezequiel Morsella
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-10

7.  Motor engagement enhances incidental memory for task-irrelevant items.

Authors:  Daisuke Shimane; Takumi Tanaka; Katsumi Watanabe; Kanji Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-16

8.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23

9.  Cognitive-motor interference while grasping, lifting and holding objects.

Authors:  Erwan Guillery; André Mouraux; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.