Literature DB >> 26680770

Sequential actions: effects of upcoming perceptual and motor tasks on current actions.

Kevin A LeBlanc1, David A Westwood2.   

Abstract

Reports of spatial interactions between current and upcoming elements in a movement sequence could be due to intentional planning of a "global" action sequence (i.e., strategic effects), or to unintentional motor planning arising from merely paying attention to upcoming target objects (i.e., interference effects). The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether paying attention to an upcoming target object could induce kinematic changes in a current grasping action when there is no strategic advantage associated with such changes. Specifically, participants grasped a rectangular target object in the presence of a second rectangular object that was either ignored, or was the target of a subsequent grasping or perceptual judgment task. Peak grip aperture during the primary grasping action was assessed in relation to the size of the second rectangle. The results revealed an effect of the second rectangle's size only when it was the target of a subsequent perceptual judgment task. This result calls into question the assumption that interactions between current and subsequent elements of an action sequence are necessarily due to strategic movement planning processes and might instead arise from interference arising from merely paying attention to nontarget objects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action; Action sequence; Attention; Grasping; Motor control; Perception; Sequential movements

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26680770     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4511-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

3.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

4.  Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: evidence from optic ataxia.

Authors:  Igor Schindler; Nichola J Rice; Robert D McIntosh; Yves Rossetti; Alain Vighetto; A David Milner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference.

Authors:  M J Riddoch; M G Edwards; G W Humphreys; R West; T Heafield
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  When flavor guides motor control: an effector independence study.

Authors:  Valentina Parma; Roberto Roverato; Deborah Ghirardello; Maria Bulgheroni; Roberto Tirindelli; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation.

Authors:  M Jeannerod; M A Arbib; G Rizzolatti; H Sakata
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Human fMRI reveals that delayed action re-recruits visual perception.

Authors:  Anthony Singhal; Simona Monaco; Liam D Kaufman; Jody C Culham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.