Literature DB >> 11849199

Randomized cross-over clinical trial to study potential pharmacokinetic interactions between cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide.

Huw D Thomas1, David J Porter, Imke Bartelink, Joy R Nobbs, Michael Cole, Suzie Elliott, David R Newell, A Hilary Calvert, Martin Highley, Alan V Boddy.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cisplatin and carboplatin are often used in combination with etoposide. In a randomized cross-over study, the potential interaction between the two platinum drugs and the metabolism of etoposide was explored. In vitro investigations using human liver microsomes were also performed.
METHODS: Etoposide was administered to 15 patients over 3 days, with the platinum drug administered on day 2. The alternate platinum drug was administered on the second course. The pharmacokinetics of etoposide were determined on all 3 days of each cycle. The effect of platinum drugs on etoposide metabolism by human liver enzymes was explored in vitro.
RESULTS: Neither cisplatin nor carboplatin coadministration affected the pharmacokinetics of etoposide during cycle 1. When carboplatin was administered on course 2, etoposide AUC was 8% higher on day 2 compared with day 1 or day 3 (for day 2 vs day 3, 95% CI: -0.72, -0.08 mg ml(-1) min). In contrast, cisplatin on course 2 increased the AUC of etoposide (28%) on day 3 (day 3 vs day 1, 95% CI: 0.67, 2.09 mg ml(-1) min), with no effect on day 2. In vitro carboplatin and cisplatin (10-100 microm) inhibited the metabolism of etoposide, if rat liver microsomes were preincubated (30 min) with NADPH and the platinum complexes. With human liver microsomes a small effect on etoposide metabolism, but not on catechol formation, was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The interaction between etoposide and platinum drugs is small and, given the pharmacokinetic variability seen with etoposide, the clinical impact is unlikely to be significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11849199      PMCID: PMC1874557          DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01513.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  29 in total

1.  Effectiveness of carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin combination chemotherapy in good-prognosis metastatic testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

Authors:  A Horwich; D P Dearnaley; J Nicholls; G Jay; M Mason; S Harland; M J Peckham; W F Hendry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Human cytochrome P450 metabolism of teniposide and etoposide.

Authors:  M V Relling; R Evans; C Dass; D M Desiderio; J Nemec
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Sequences of taxol and cisplatin: a phase I and pharmacologic study.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky; M R Gilbert; W P McGuire; D A Noe; L B Grochow; A A Forastiere; D S Ettinger; B G Lubejko; B Clark; S E Sartorius
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Relationships between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D I Jodrell; M J Egorin; R M Canetta; P Langenberg; E P Goldbloom; J N Burroughs; J L Goodlow; S Tan; E Wiltshaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Sequencing and schedule effects of cisplatin plus etoposide in small-cell lung cancer: results of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A W Maksymiuk; J R Jett; J D Earle; J Q Su; F A Diegert; J A Mailliard; C G Kardinal; J E Krook; M H Veeder; M Wiesenfeld
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pharmacokinetics of etoposide: correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters with clinical conditions.

Authors:  K H Pflüger; M Hahn; J B Holz; L Schmidt; P Köhl; H W Fritsch; H Jungclas; K Havemann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Randomized trial of etoposide and cisplatin versus etoposide and carboplatin in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional study.

Authors:  D F Bajorin; M F Sarosdy; D G Pfister; M Mazumdar; R J Motzer; H I Scher; N L Geller; W R Fair; H Herr; P Sogani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Etoposide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after acute and chronic exposure to cisplatin.

Authors:  M V Relling; H L McLeod; L C Bowman; V M Santana
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  O-demethylation of epipodophyllotoxins is catalyzed by human cytochrome P450 3A4.

Authors:  M V Relling; J Nemec; E G Schuetz; J D Schuetz; F J Gonzalez; K R Korzekwa
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  2 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan in children: a re-evaluation of paediatric dosing formulas for carboplatin in patients with normal or mild impairment of renal function.

Authors:  J K Duong; G J Veal; C E Nath; P J Shaw; J Errington; R Ladenstein; A V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer - dilemmas and solutions.

Authors:  Renata Rezonja; Lea Knez; Tanja Cufer; Ales Mrhar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.