Literature DB >> 8639238

The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability.

P P Binon1.   

Abstract

A series of 10 incrementally larger, machined ASTM Grade 23 titanium non-segmented (UCLA type) abutments was loaded off axis with 133 N and cycled at 1150 vertical strokes per minute and 28 counterclockwise rotations per minute to determine screw joint stability. Abutment internal hexagonals ranged from 0.1065 to 0.1110 inches. External hexagonal mean flat-to-flat width was 2.684 mm. Rotational misfit between international and external hexagonals ranged from 1.94 degrees for the smallest abutment to 14.87 degrees for the largest. Screw joint failure ranged from 134,000 to 9.3 million cycles. The tightest matrix/patrix hexagonal screw joint failed at a mean of 6.7 million cycles. This study indicated that there was a direct correlation between hexagonal misfit and screw joint loosening. A rotational misfit of under 2 degrees provided the most stable and predictable screw joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8639238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  25 in total

1.  Implant adaptation of stock abutments versus CAD/CAM abutments: a radiographic and Scanning Electron Microscopy study.

Authors:  Davide Apicella; Mario Veltri; Nicoletta Chieffi; Antonella Polimeni; Agostino Giovannetti; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-02-13

2.  Determination of fluid leakages in the different screw-retained implant-abutment connections in a mechanical artificial mouth.

Authors:  D Martin-Gili; M Molmeneu; M Fernandez; M Punset; Ll Giner; J Armengou; F Javier Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Management of abutment screw loosening: review of literature and report of a case.

Authors:  Vinod Krishnan; C Tony Thomas; Ipe Sabu
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-10-25

4.  Effect of cement washout on loosening of abutment screws and vice versa in screw- and cement- retained implant-supported dental prosthesis.

Authors:  Seok-Gyu Kim; Chae-Heon Chung; Mee-Kyoung Son
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  The change of rotational freedom following different insertion torques in three implant systems with implant driver.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Kwon; Chong-Hyun Han; Sun-Jai Kim; Jae-Seung Chang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection.

Authors:  Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Silvan Kraft; Sebastian Stiller; Juergen Mehrhof; Katja Nelson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Correlation between microleakage and screw loosening at implant-abutment connection.

Authors:  Cem Sahin; Simel Ayyildiz
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Three-dimensional accuracy of different correction methods for cast implant bars.

Authors:  Ji-Yung Kwon; Chang-Whe Kim; Young-Jun Lim; Ho-Beom Kwon; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  A 3-year prospective cohort study on mandibular anterior cantilever restorations associated with screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Vizaikumar Vasudha Nelluri; Kandathilparambil Maria Roseme; Rajani Kumar Gedela
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun

10.  Accuracy combining different brands of implants and abutments.

Authors:  María-Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Eduardo Selva-Otaolaurruchi; Gisela Senent-Vicente; Inés González-de-Cossio; Vicente Amigó-Borrás
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.