Literature DB >> 3665696

First-order Wiener kernel visually evoked potentials obtained from multiple sclerosis patients.

D V Schoon1, E K Wong.   

Abstract

Visually evoked potentials (VEP) were measured in multiple sclerosis patients with five sizes of reversing check stimuli. The VEPs were obtained using random binary sequence triggered check reversals. The random binary sequence was cross-correlated with scalp potential responses to obtain the estimates of the linear response of the system. For each evaluation a series of five VEPs, one for each of five check sizes, was done. A correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate check size versus amplitude of the major negative wave. A tabulation was made to compare Snellen chart visual acuity with these correlation coefficients. For the eyes with a Snellen acuity of 20/20, 63% of the VEP amplitudes increased as the check size was decreased with correlation coefficients of -0.6 to -1. For the eyes with a Snellen acuity of 20/70 or less the amplitude decreased with the check size decrease, showing a correlation coefficient of +0.6 to +1 in 45% of the evaluations. The check size giving the largest amplitude was also tabulated with respect to the visual acuity, but did not appear to have as strong a relationship to visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3665696     DOI: 10.1007/bf00162727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  18 in total

1.  The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Hennerici; D Wenzel; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Relationship between pattern appearance-disappearance and pattern reversal responses.

Authors:  O Estévez; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1974-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The recovery cycle of the pattern visual evoked potential in normal subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J D Mitchell; S Hansen; A McInnes; F W Campbell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-10

4.  The objective assessment of contrast sensitivity function by electrophysiological means.

Authors:  J W Howe; K W Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The 20/20 eye in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M J Kupersmith; J I Nelson; W H Seiple; R E Carr; P A Weiss
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Orientation-specific losses of contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Regan; J A Whitlock; T J Murray; K I Beverley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis--hidden visual loss: an auxiliary diagnostic test.

Authors:  D Regan; R Silver; T J Murray
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Fever and evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Kazis; N Vlaikidis; D Xafenias; J Papanastasiou; P Pappa
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Subclinical visual field defects in multiple sclerosis. Demonstration and quantification with automated perimetry, and comparison with visually evoked potentials.

Authors:  O Mienberg; J Flammer; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Multimodality evoked potentials and neurophysiological tests in multiple sclerosis. Effects of hyperthermia on test results.

Authors:  K R Phillips; A R Potvin; K Syndulko; S N Cohen; W W Tourtellotte; J H Potvin
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1983-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Henkes and the physicist or 40 years of interaction.

Authors:  L H van der Tweel
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.