Literature DB >> 19146277

Brief subjective durations contract with repetition.

Vani Pariyadath1, David M Eagleman.   

Abstract

Neural responses to a repeated stimulus typically diminish, an effect known as repetition suppression. We here demonstrate what appear to be parallel effects of repetition on subjective duration, even when stimuli are presented too rapidly for explicit temporal judgments. When a brief visual stimulus (e.g., a letter, word, object, or face) was serially flashed in different locations, several stimuli appeared to be present simultaneously due to persistence of vision-we term this the Proliferation Effect. Critically, fewer stimuli were perceived to be simultaneously present when the same stimulus was flashed repeatedly than when a different stimulus was used for each flash, indicating that persistence of vision (and hence subjective duration) shrinks for predictable stimuli. These short-timescale experiments demonstrate that subjective durations are computed at a preconscious and implicit level of processing, thereby changing the temporal interpretation of visual scenes. Further, these findings suggest a new, instant diagnostic test for deficits in repetition suppression, such as those found in schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146277      PMCID: PMC2849750          DOI: 10.1167/8.16.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  35 in total

1.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Chris L E Paffen; Hinze Hogendoorn; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Temporal dynamics of face repetition suppression.

Authors:  Alumit Ishai; Philip C Bikle; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Visual onset expands subjective time.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Masataka Watanabe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-10

4.  Independent domains of inhibitory gating in schizophrenia and the effect of stimulus interval.

Authors:  L Elliot Hong; Ann Summerfelt; Ikwunga Wonodi; Helene Adami; Robert W Buchanan; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  The path of least persistence: object status mediates visual updating.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; J Toby Mordkoff; James T Enns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Temporal characteristics of iconic memory.

Authors:  V Di Lollo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of an auditory oddball task in schizophrenia.

Authors:  K A Kiehl; P F Liddle
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Human time perception and its illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Emily H Trittschuh; Jim M Monti; M Marsel Mesulam; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The effect of predictability on subjective duration.

Authors:  Vani Pariyadath; David Eagleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Working memory modulates the perception of time.

Authors:  Yi Pan; Qian-Ying Luo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation.

Authors:  Ming Bo Cai; David M Eagleman; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Harriet Lloyd; Domenica Bueti; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Changes in apparent duration follow shifts in perceptual timing.

Authors:  Aurelio Bruno; Inci Ayhan; Alan Johnston
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual adaptation and novelty responses in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Susan E Boehnke; David J Berg; Robert A Marino; Pierre F Baldi; Laurent Itti; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James V M Hanson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Authors:  Aurelio Bruno; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-19

9.  Effects of Temporal Features and Order on the Apparent duration of a Visual Stimulus.

Authors:  Aurelio Bruno; Inci Ayhan; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-21

10.  Reducing bias in auditory duration reproduction by integrating the reproduced signal.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; Stephanie Ganzenmüller; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.