Literature DB >> 8574199

Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise.

B C Moore1, B R Glasberg, D A Vickers.   

Abstract

This experiment simulated the threshold elevation and loudness recruitment associated with three different types of hearing loss: moderate flat (condition R2), severe flat (condition R3), and moderate-to-severe sloping (condition RX). This was done to allow an examination of the effects of these factors on the intelligibility of speech, in isolation from other factors that are normally associated with cochlear hearing loss, such as reduced frequency selectivity. The speech was presented at a fixed input level of 65 dB SPL, against a background of a noise whose spectrum was shaped to match the long-term average spectrum of the speech. The level of the background noise varied from 65 to 74 dB SPL. The simulation was performed by splitting the input signal into 13 frequency bands, and processing the envelope in each band so as to create loudness sensations in a normal ear that would resemble those produced in an impaired ear with recruitment. The bands were then recombined. All tests were performed using subjects with normal hearing. The simulation of hearing loss produced decrements in performance. The speech in condition R3 was inaudible. For conditions R2 and RX, the speech-to-noise ratios had to be up to 6 dB higher than in the control condition (R1, unprocessed stimuli) to achieve similar levels of performance. When linear amplification according to the NAL prescription was applied before the simulation, performance improved markedly for conditions R2 and RX, and did not differ significantly from that for R1. For condition R3, performance with simulated NAL amplification remained below that for condition R1; the decrement in performance was equivalent to about a 1 dB change in speech-to-noise ratio. The results of the present experiment show much smaller decrements in performance than those of an earlier experiment using a single talker as the interfering sound (Moore and Glasberg, 1993). It appears that loudness recruitment and threshold elevation have larger effects for a fluctuating background sound than for a steady background sound, and linear amplification is more effective in the latter case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8574199     DOI: 10.3109/03005369509086590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  16 in total

1.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

2.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Clinical evaluation of an image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Optimization of frequency lowering algorithms for getting the highest speech intelligibility improvement by hearing loss simulation.

Authors:  Umut Arıöz; Banu Günel
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Results of Postoperative, CT-based, Electrode Deactivation on Hearing in Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Benoit M Dawant; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sensorineural hearing loss amplifies neural coding of envelope information in the central auditory system of chinchillas.

Authors:  Ziwei Zhong; Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Does Asymmetric Hearing Loss Affect the Ability to Understand in Noisy Environments?

Authors:  Rafael Barona; Juan Antonio Vizcaino; Claudio Krstulovic; Luz Barona; Carmen Comeche; Jose Montalt; Mercedes Ubeda; Carolina Polo
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  Envelope coding in auditory nerve fibers following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-16

10.  Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  Ryan E Scheidt; Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.