Literature DB >> 26719955

Results of Postoperative, CT-based, Electrode Deactivation on Hearing in Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Robert F Labadie1, Jack H Noble, Andrea J Hedley-Williams, Linsey W Sunderhaus, Benoit M Dawant, René H Gifford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the use of a novel, image-guided cochlear implant (CI) programming (IGCIP) technique on prelingually deafened, adult CI recipients. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective unblinded study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-six prelingually deafened adult CI recipients with 29 CIs (3 bilateral). INTERVENTION(S): Temporal-bone CT scans were used as input to a series of semiautomated computer algorithms which estimate the location of electrodes in reference to the modiolus. This information was used to selectively deactivate suboptimally located electrodes, i.e., those for which the distance from the electrode to the modiolus was further than a neighboring electrode to the same site. Patients used the new IGCIP program exclusively for 3-5 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB), quality of life (QOL), and spectral modulation detection (SMD).
RESULTS: On average one-third of electrodes were deactivated. At the group level, no significant differences were noted for MSTB measures nor for QOL estimates. Average SMD significantly improved after IGCIP reprogramming, which is consistent with improved spatial selectivity. Using 95% confidence interval data for CNC, AzBio, and BKB-SIN at the individual level, 76 to 90% of subjects demonstrated equivocal or significant improvement. Ultimately 21 of 29 (72.41%) elected to keep the IGCIP map because of perceived benefit often substantiated by improvement on either MSTB, QOL, and/or SMD.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the geometric relationship between CI electrodes and the modiolus appears to be useful in adjusting CI maps in prelingually deafened adults. Long-term improvements may be observed resulting from improved spatial selectivity and spectral resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26719955      PMCID: PMC4712086          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  49 in total

1.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; W S Parkinson; R S Tyler; B J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Speech perception and production performance of prelingually deafened adolescents after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  R K Wong; E Chung; Y Hui; B Wong; W I Wei
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000

3.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets.

Authors:  Carolyn Garnham; Martin O'Driscoll; Richard Ramsden And; Shakeel Saeed
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness.

Authors:  David Schramm; Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Christiane Séguin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Manrique; F J Cervera-Paz; A Huarte; N Perez; M Molina; R García-Tapia
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Delayed implantation in congenitally deaf children and adults.

Authors:  Susan B Waltzman; J Thomas Roland; Noel L Cohen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Human brain plasticity: evidence from sensory deprivation and altered language experience.

Authors:  Helen Neville; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Holly S Venick; John K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  14 in total

1.  Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Selecting electrode configurations for image-guided cochlear implant programming using template matching.

Authors:  Dongqing Zhang; Yiyuan Zhao; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-11

4.  Temporal Modulation Detection Depends on Sharpness of Spatial Tuning.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Matthew Cadmus; Lixue Dong; Juliana Mathews
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-25

5.  Two-level Training of a 3d U-Net for Accurate Segmentation of the Intra-cochlear Anatomy in Head CTs with Limited Ground Truth Training Data.

Authors:  Dongqing Zhang; Rueben Banalagay; Jianing Wang; Yiyuan Zhao; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-15

6.  Longitudinal effect of deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kevin Xu; Shelby Willis; Quinton Gopen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a historical analysis of methods and results.

Authors:  Robert W Koch; Hanif M Ladak; Mai Elfarnawany; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-07

10.  The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Stephen M Camarata; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Robert T Dwyer; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.