Literature DB >> 11273423

Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants.

M A Svirsky1, A M Robbins, K I Kirk, D B Pisoni, R T Miyamoto.   

Abstract

Although cochlear implants improve the ability of profoundly deaf children to understand speech, critics claim that the published literature does not document even a single case of a child who has developed a linguistic system based on input from an implant. Thus, it is of clinical and scientific importance to determine whether cochlear implants facilitate the development of English language skills. The English language skills of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants were measured before and after implantation. We found that the rate of language development after implantation exceeded that expected from unimplanted deaf children (p < .001) and was similar to that of children with normal hearing. Despite a large amount of individual variability, the best performers in the implanted group seem to be developing an oral linguistic system based largely on auditory input obtained from a cochlear implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11273423      PMCID: PMC3429133          DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  21 in total

1.  Language development in children with profound and prelingual hearing loss, without cochlear implants.

Authors:  M A Svirsky
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  Speech intelligibility of prelingually deaf children with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  M A Svirsky; R B Sloan; M Caldwell; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

3.  Comparison of speech perception in pediatric CLARION cochlear implant and hearing aid users.

Authors:  M A Svirsky; T A Meyer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1999-04

4.  Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children: a review and reply from a Deaf-World perspective.

Authors:  H Lane; B Bahan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Performance of young hearing-impaired children on a test of basic concepts.

Authors:  J Davis
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1974-09

6.  Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  D K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  EPIC. Experimental project in the instructional concentration. Evaluation and results.

Authors:  A E Geers; G Kuehn; J S Moog
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1981-11

Review 8.  [Rehabilitation of patients with hearing loss by cochlear implants].

Authors:  W Gstoettner; J Hamzavi; C Czerny
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  R S Tyler; H Fryauf-Bertschy; D M Kelsay; B J Gantz; G P Woodworth; A Parkinson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Improvement in speech perception and production abilities in children using a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  S Waltzman; N L Cohen; L Spivak; E Ying; D Brackett; W Shapiro; R Hoffman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  127 in total

1.  Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.

Authors:  L Lachs; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  Ted A Meyer; Stefan A Frisch; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Influence of DFNB1 status on expressive language in deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Simon I Angeli; Hamlet Suarez; Alina Lopez; Thomas J Balkany; Xue Z Liu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Language and verbal reasoning skills in adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Allison L Sedey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Johanna Grant Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Cleary; D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  D L Horn; R A O Davis; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Spoken word recognition in toddlers who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Jenny R Saffran; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.