Literature DB >> 2967924

Microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy.

H R Silvers1.   

Abstract

Two hundred seventy consecutive patients operated upon by standard discectomy were compared to 270 patients treated with microlumbar discectomy. All patients had back and leg pain, as well as positive clinical findings and positive myelograms suggestive of disc herniation. The results demonstrated a 98% success rate in the microsurgical group as compared to a 95% success rate in the standard laminectomy group. Of microdiscectomy patients, 95% had an excellent result, as compared to 89% of the standard laminectomy group. Patients with pending compensation cases did only slightly poorer than those with no secondary gain regardless of what procedure was used. The postoperative hospital stay of the microsurgical patients averaged 3.7 days as compared to 7.1 for the standard technique. The time before return to work was significantly shorter in patients undergoing microdiscectomy. Microdiscectomy proved to be superior in both clinical results and cost effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2967924     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198805000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Percutaneous discectomy using Onik's method: 3 years' experience.

Authors:  G Bonaldi; G Belloni; D Prosetti; L Moschini
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Spinal surgery.

Authors:  R Johnston
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K Faulhauer; C Manicke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  J Krämer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Microsurgical management of the lumbar intervertebral disc-disease.

Authors:  A Kulali; K von Wild
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Evaluation of standard nucleotomy for lumbar disc herniation using the Love method: results of follow-up studies after more than 10 years.

Authors:  Yasuo Saruhashi; Kanji Mori; Akitomo Katsuura; Shinobu Takahashi; Yoshitaka Matsusue; Sinsuke Hukuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  A systematic review of randomised clinical trials using posterior discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations.

Authors:  Alberto Gotfryd; Osmar Avanzi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.