Literature DB >> 3200393

Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report.

S Young1, R Veerapen, S A O'Laoire.   

Abstract

We describe an operative approach to lumbar canal stenosis which, unlike laminectomy, takes into account the segmental pathology of the disease. At each level involved, a bilateral subarticular fenestration is performed under high magnification. The medial third of each facet joint is first removed with an air-powered drill; then the remaining two-thirds of the joint is undercut with the drill to allow a generous fenestration in the thickened ligamentum flavum and adjacent laminae. All tissue responsible for neural compression is removed, but the spinous processes, interspinous ligaments, and much of the facet joints and laminae are preserved. Spinal stability is maintained and, because tissue disruption is minimized, postoperative discomfort is usually reduced, promoting early mobility and reduced hospital stay. The operation is described in detail, and the results of operation in 32 patients are assessed. The follow-up periods now range from 17 to 58 months. Of 23 patients who presented with neurogenic claudication, 14 (61%) obtained complete relief and 7 (30%) improved significantly. The mean hospital stay was 9 days (range, 4 to 17 days).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3200393     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198811000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  29 in total

Review 1.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Bilateral decompression using a unilateral pedicle construct for lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Lu Mao; Jie Zhao; Ke-Rong Dai; Li Hua; Xiao-Jiang Sun
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Microsurgical management of the lumbar intervertebral disc-disease.

Authors:  A Kulali; K von Wild
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Limited laminectomy and restorative spinoplasty in spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Sukhbir Singh Sangwan; Rakesh Garg; Paritosh Gogna; Zile Singh Kundu; Vinay Gupta; Pradeep Kamboj
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

6.  [Unilateral approach for over the top bilateral lumbar decompression].

Authors:  Franziska C Heider; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Less invasive and less technically demanding decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis--appropriate for general orthopaedic surgeons?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Takamitsu Okada; Kensuke Fukushima; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Hiroyuki Sakagami; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Toshiaki Kotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].

Authors:  A Korge; C Mehren; S Ruetten
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Precise and limited decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  W Caspar; L Papavero; M K Sayler; H L Harkey
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Won-Seok Choi; Chang Hyun Oh; Gyu Yeul Ji; Sung Chan Shin; Jang-Bo Lee; Dong-Hyuk Park; Tai-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.