Literature DB >> 1994285

The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure.

W Caspar1, B Campbell, D D Barbier, R Kretschmmer, Y Gotfried.   

Abstract

The outcome in 119 patients who were operated on with a conventional standard lumbar discectomy procedure was retrospectively compared with that in 299 patients who were operated on with a microsurgical discectomy technique developed in Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany by the senior author (W.C.). All patients in this consecutive series had "virgin" lumbar radiculopathy evaluated and operated upon by two experienced surgeons at one institution. Determination of the final outcome was made objectively by an impartial third party using identical criteria for both groups, and with a patient self-evaluation form. The study looked at various pertinent aspects of the treatment course and at final outcome. The results in the microsurgical group were significantly favorable: fewer levels were explored: there was less operative blood loss and a decreased incidence of deep venous thrombosis, urinary tract infections, pulmonary emboli, and bladder catheterization; the time to full ambulation, discharge, and return to work was faster: and there was a decrease in change of occupation and a greater percentage of satisfactory final outcomes, as measured both objectively and subjectively. A description of the microsurgical technique used in this study, which differs significantly from existing microdisectomy techniques, is presented. The authors conclude that the microsurgical disectomy technique presented in this study is a safe and effective approach to the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1994285     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199101000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  38 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K Faulhauer; C Manicke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy.

Authors:  Ryuichi Sasaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura; Sadahiko Konishi; Ryuichi Nagayama; Eisuke Suzuki; Hidetomi Terai; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Microsurgical management of the lumbar intervertebral disc-disease.

Authors:  A Kulali; K von Wild
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Precise and limited decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  W Caspar; L Papavero; M K Sayler; H L Harkey
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  The profile of multiple- versus single-operated patients at the time of their first operation for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-24

10.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.