Literature DB >> 8568037

Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.

S Puria1, J J Guinan, M C Liberman.   

Abstract

The strength of the olivocochlear reflex has been assayed by comparing ipsilateral cochlear responses with and without contralateral sound. In humans, ipsilateral cochlear responses have usually been inferred by measuring otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), whereas, in animal work, they have been assessed by measuring compound action potentials (CAPs). Thus reports that the reflex strength is smaller in humans than in animals cannot be interpreted until the differences between the two tests are better understood. The present study directly compares reflex assays using distortion-product (DP) OAE and CAP measures in the same animals. For ipsilateral frequencies of 2-8 kHz and levels from 25 to 80 dB SPL, efferent reflex strength was computed from the CAP or DPOAE amplitude-versus-level curves measured with and without contralateral noise. The "effective attenuation" produced by efferent activation was, with few exceptions, greater when measured with the CAP than with the DPOAE assay. Differences between the two measures increased as frequency increased, with differences as large as 10 dB observed. These results, coupled with previous measurements on humans and animals, suggest that the efferent reflex is at least as strong in humans as has been shown in animal experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8568037     DOI: 10.1121/1.414508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Sound-evoked olivocochlear activation in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Diversity of axonal ramifications belonging to single lateral and medial olivocochlear neurons.

Authors:  W Bruce Warr; Jo Ellen Boche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Hajime Usubuchi; Douglas E Vetter; A Bélen Elgoyhen; Steven A Thomas; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Modeling the anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses to tones in sustained noise.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04

6.  Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Bradford C Backus; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-12

7.  Modeling the time-varying and level-dependent effects of the medial olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-05

8.  Time course of the suppression effect on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions by prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Kang; Hyun Joon Shim; Seong Jun Song; Seong Hee Lee; Sang Won Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2012-12-18

9.  Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?

Authors:  Erik Larsen; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Daniel H Lee; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.