Literature DB >> 8538447

The functions of phonology in the acquisition of reading: lexical and sentence processing.

R S Johnston1, G B Thompson, C M Fletcher-Flinn, C Holligan.   

Abstract

It has been claimed (V. Coltheart, Laxon, Rickard, & Elton, 1988) that learners as well as skilled readers use phonology for multiple functions in reading-for-meaning tasks. This claim was examined using lexical decision and sentence evaluation tasks. It was found in the first experiment that the type of instruction learners had received determined whether there was prelexical use of phonology in responding to items out of sentence context. Type of instruction had no effect when the items were in context. In the second experiment, performances on a homophone sentence evaluation task and a homophone semantic decision task, which excluded sentence processing, were examined. The results suggest that phonology served the function of access to lexical meanings in addition to any function in postlexical sentence processing. The obtained relationships between relative frequencies of the presented and unpresented homophone mates and item accuracy on these tasks were inconsistent with exclusive use of "direct access" but consistent with access of lexical meaning via phonology and application of a "spelling-check" procedure when multiple homophonic meanings are activated.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8538447     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

Review 1.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; B F Pennington; G O Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The role of assembled phonology in reading comprehension.

Authors:  V Coltheart; S E Avons; J Masterson; V J Laxon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

3.  Is dependence on phonological information in children's reading a product of instructional approach?

Authors:  R S Johnston; G B Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1989-08

4.  Are words represented by nodes?

Authors:  G O Stone; G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-09

5.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

6.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; J C Johnston; B L Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Strategic control of processing in word recognition.

Authors:  G O Stone; G C Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning.

Authors:  E A Doctor; M Coltheart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-05

9.  An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?

Authors:  M Taft
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-09

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  At-lexical, articulatory interference in silent reading: the "upstream" tongue-twister effect.

Authors:  D H Robinson; A D Katayama
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

Review 2.  Early literacy experiences constrain L1 and L2 reading procedures.

Authors:  Adeetee Bhide
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-02

3.  Phonological recoding in error detection: a cross-sectional study in beginning readers of Dutch.

Authors:  Eva Van Assche; Wouter Duyck; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.