| Literature DB >> 2247539 |
G C Van Orden1, B F Pennington, G O Stone.
Abstract
The vast literature concerning printed word identification either contradicts or provides ambiguous support for each of the central hypotheses of dual-process theory, the most widely accepted theory of printed word identification. In contrast, clear, positive support exists for an alternative subsymbolic approach that includes a central role for the process of phonologic coding. This subsymbolic account is developed around a covariant learning hypothesis, derived from a design principle common to current learning algorithms within the subsymbolic paradigm. Where this hypothesis applies, and it may apply broadly, it predicts a common empirical profile of development.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1990 PMID: 2247539 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Rev ISSN: 0033-295X Impact factor: 8.934