Literature DB >> 16572318

[The influence of jet-lavage systems on in vitro cement penetration].

C-R Becker1, B Lehner, S Ungethüm, S J Breusch.   

Abstract

The benefit of pulsatile lavage on cement penetration in femoral cancellous bone is well known. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different jet-lavage systems on cement penetration in a standardized cadaver study. Four different jet-lavage systems were compared (right vs left) in 30 paired human femora. After broaching, the femoral canal was lavaged with 1 l saline. The specimens were embedded in plastic pots, bone cement was applied in a retrograde manner and cement was pressurized using a standard pressure protocol with a constant force of 3,000 N. Horizontal sections were obtained at predefined levels using an automatic saw. Microradiographs were taken and analysed using image analysis to assess the extent of cement penetration. There were no significant differences in cement penetration into cancellous bone using the different jet-lavage systems. This technique is of great importance for obtaining a good interdigitation with cancellous bone. The different jet-lavage systems investigated in our study, however, seemed to be equally effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16572318     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0932-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  25 in total

1.  [Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration].

Authors:  S J Breusch; U Schneider; T Reitzel; J Kreutzer; V Ewerbeck; M Lukoschek
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  [Effects of the cementing technique on cementing results concerning the coxal end of the femur].

Authors:  S J Breusch; U Schneider; J Kreutzer; V Ewerbeck; M Lukoschek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur.

Authors:  S J Breusch; T L Norman; U Schneider; T Reitzel; J D Blaha; M Lukoschek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  In vitro measurement of bone-acrylic interface pressure during femoral component insertion.

Authors:  K L Markolf; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.

Authors:  R L Barrack; R D Mulroy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

6.  High-volume, high-pressure pulsatile lavage during cemented arthroplasty.

Authors:  R J Byrick; R S Bell; J C Kay; J P Waddell; J B Mullen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The influence of cementing technique and blood on the strength of the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  G C Bannister; A W Miles
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1988-07

Review 8.  [Thromboembolic complications related to the use of bone cement in hip arthroplasty--pathogenesis and prophylaxis].

Authors:  C Heisel; M Clarius; U Schneider; S J Breusch
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 May-Jun

9.  Current attitudes to cementing techniques in British hip surgery.

Authors:  A Hashemi-Nejad; N C Birch; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Medullary lavage reduces embolic phenomena and cardiopulmonary changes during cemented hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  J Christie; C M Robinson; B Singer; D C Ray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.