Literature DB >> 21251430

Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.

Stephen Hunt1, Craig Stone, Shane Seal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern cementing techniques aim to fix the implanted femoral prosthesis in the medullary cavity to minimize long-term complications such as aseptic loosening. The cure stage of bone cement into which the femoral component is being inserted is an important variable that is decided at the time of surgery. Late-cure cement is more viscous than early-cure cement and requires greater force on the part of the surgeon to insert the femoral prosthesis. We compared 2 cementing techniques, femoral component insertion into early-cure cement and insertion into late-cure cement, using an in vivo model to identify if cement cure stage affects the strength of the bone-cement interface.
METHODS: We performed bilateral hemiarthroplasties using only the femoral component in vivo on paired porcine femora. The femora were harvested and cross-sectioned in preparation for strength testing. We measured bond strength by peak load required to push the femoral prosthesis and surrounding cement mantle free of the cancellous bone.
RESULTS: All radiographs showed good cement interdigitation with no evidence of radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface. We could not differentiate the early-cure and late-cure groups on postoperative radiographs. The mean failure load for the late-cure arthroplasties was 908 N (standard deviation [SD] 420 N), whereas the mean failure load for the conjugate early-cure arthroplasties was 503 N (SD 342 N).
CONCLUSION: Femoral component insertion into late-cure cement required significantly higher loads for push-out than femoral component insertion into early-cure cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251430      PMCID: PMC3038367          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.001110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  31 in total

1.  The Frank Stinchfield Award. Influence of cement technique on the interface strength of femoral components.

Authors:  M F Shepard; J M Kabo; J R Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.

Authors:  A D Reading; A W McCaskie; M R Barnes; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Current cementing techniques in hip hemi-arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Scott; A W McCaskie; S J Calder; C Wildin; P J Gregg
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Femoral stem insertion generates high bone cement pressurization.

Authors:  D L Churchill; S J Incavo; J A Uroskie; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Effects of early and late stage cement intrusion into cancellous bone.

Authors:  Michael R Dayton; Stephen J Incavo; David L Churchill; Jonathan A Uroskie; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The effect of different cement insertion techniques on the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  J G Horne; W Bruce; P A Devane; H H Teoh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Influence of cement viscosity on cement interdigitation and venous fat content under in vivo conditions: a bilateral study of 13 sheep.

Authors:  Steffen Breusch; Christian Heisel; Jens Müller; Tanja Borchers; Hans Mau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-08

8.  The timing of femoral component insertion in cemented hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T G McWilliams; M S Binns
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: an in vitro model with medullary bleeding.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Sameer Gupta; Paul Higham; Michael T Clarke; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Effects of laminations and blood entrapment on the strength of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  T A Gruen; K L Markolf; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art.

Authors:  Ahmed K Emara; Mitchell Ng; Viktor E Krebs; Michael Bloomfield; Robert M Molloy; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-01-16

2.  A quantitative analysis of two cementing techniques in total elbow replacement: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Maartje Michielsen; Maxime Masson; Annemieke van Haver; Matthias Vanhees; Roger van Riet
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-01-18

3.  Effect of rivaroxaban on preventing deep vein thrombosis in aged diabetics with femoral neck fractures after hip replacement.

Authors:  Yi-Min Zhang; Xin Jiang; Yan-Shan Sun
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.