Stephen Hunt1, Craig Stone, Shane Seal. 1. Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty of Medicine, 135 Newtown Road, St. John's, NL. stephen.hunt@mun.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern cementing techniques aim to fix the implanted femoral prosthesis in the medullary cavity to minimize long-term complications such as aseptic loosening. The cure stage of bone cement into which the femoral component is being inserted is an important variable that is decided at the time of surgery. Late-cure cement is more viscous than early-cure cement and requires greater force on the part of the surgeon to insert the femoral prosthesis. We compared 2 cementing techniques, femoral component insertion into early-cure cement and insertion into late-cure cement, using an in vivo model to identify if cement cure stage affects the strength of the bone-cement interface. METHODS: We performed bilateral hemiarthroplasties using only the femoral component in vivo on paired porcine femora. The femora were harvested and cross-sectioned in preparation for strength testing. We measured bond strength by peak load required to push the femoral prosthesis and surrounding cement mantle free of the cancellous bone. RESULTS: All radiographs showed good cement interdigitation with no evidence of radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface. We could not differentiate the early-cure and late-cure groups on postoperative radiographs. The mean failure load for the late-cure arthroplasties was 908 N (standard deviation [SD] 420 N), whereas the mean failure load for the conjugate early-cure arthroplasties was 503 N (SD 342 N). CONCLUSION: Femoral component insertion into late-cure cement required significantly higher loads for push-out than femoral component insertion into early-cure cement.
BACKGROUND: Modern cementing techniques aim to fix the implanted femoral prosthesis in the medullary cavity to minimize long-term complications such as aseptic loosening. The cure stage of bone cement into which the femoral component is being inserted is an important variable that is decided at the time of surgery. Late-cure cement is more viscous than early-cure cement and requires greater force on the part of the surgeon to insert the femoral prosthesis. We compared 2 cementing techniques, femoral component insertion into early-cure cement and insertion into late-cure cement, using an in vivo model to identify if cement cure stage affects the strength of the bone-cement interface. METHODS: We performed bilateral hemiarthroplasties using only the femoral component in vivo on paired porcine femora. The femora were harvested and cross-sectioned in preparation for strength testing. We measured bond strength by peak load required to push the femoral prosthesis and surrounding cement mantle free of the cancellous bone. RESULTS: All radiographs showed good cement interdigitation with no evidence of radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface. We could not differentiate the early-cure and late-cure groups on postoperative radiographs. The mean failure load for the late-cure arthroplasties was 908 N (standard deviation [SD] 420 N), whereas the mean failure load for the conjugate early-cure arthroplasties was 503 N (SD 342 N). CONCLUSION: Femoral component insertion into late-cure cement required significantly higher loads for push-out than femoral component insertion into early-cure cement.
Authors: Michael R Dayton; Stephen J Incavo; David L Churchill; Jonathan A Uroskie; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Sameer Gupta; Paul Higham; Michael T Clarke; Kenneth A Mann Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Ahmed K Emara; Mitchell Ng; Viktor E Krebs; Michael Bloomfield; Robert M Molloy; Nicolas S Piuzzi Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2021-01-16