Literature DB >> 18437380

The effect of bone porosity on the shear strength of the bone-cement interface.

Rouin Amirfeyz1, Gordon Bannister.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship of bone porosity and bone-cement interface shear strength. One hundred forty-six samples were taken from the distal metaphysis of 20 bovine femora. After cementation, the shear strength of the bone-cement interface was tested. According to the porosity, the samples were divided into four groups. Group I (porosity <80%) had a median interface shear strength of 4.03 MPa, group II (80% <or=porosity <85%) 7.06 MPa, group III (85% <or=porosity <90%) 9.44 MPa, and group IV (porosity >or=90%) 14.85 MPa. The differences between the four groups were statistically significant. Greater porosity yielded a stronger bone-cement interface shear strength under the identical cementation technique. The optimum porosity of cancellous bone is more than 90% which can be found by reaming or drilling to deeper bone in cemented acetabular fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18437380      PMCID: PMC2903095          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0558-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Radiology of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. A comparison of socket fixation techniques.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; K Terayama
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-05

3.  The influence of cementing technique and blood on the strength of the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  G C Bannister; A W Miles
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1988-07

4.  Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Y Dohmae; J E Bechtold; R E Sherman; R M Puno; R B Gustilo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Loosening of the cemented acetabular cup in total hip replacement.

Authors:  G B Andersson; M A Freeman; S A Swanson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1972-11

6.  The impact of modern cement techniques on acetabular fixation in cemented total hip replacement.

Authors:  C N Cornell; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Strength of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  W R Krause; W Krug; J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  M Halawa; A J Lee; R S Ling; S S Vangala
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1978-08-11

9.  Factors affecting the mechanical stability of the cemented acetabular component in total hip replacement.

Authors:  R G Volz; R J Wilson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation.

Authors:  M J Askew; J W Steege; J L Lewis; J R Ranieri; R L Wixson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mechanical properties of a cemented porous implant interface.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Joern B Seeger; Matthias Cm Klotz; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Biomechanical effects of morphological variations of the cortical wall at the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Zhang; Guo-Qi Shen; Kun-Peng Zhu; Dong-Xu Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.