Literature DB >> 8490668

ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones?

J Hofbauer1, C Tuerk, K Höbarth, R Hasun, M Marberger.   

Abstract

As documented by follow-up data on ureteric stones in 1259 ureteric units treated, ESWL in situ on advanced lithotriptors with stone location by ultrasonography and fluoroscopy was successful without any retrograde ureteric manipulation in 98% of stones in the upper, 71% in the iliac, and 84% in the distal ureter; 85% of the units were stone-free within 3 months: ancillary measures were needed in 11% and the stone-free state was reached after a median of 39 days. The results obtained with treatment after manipulation of the stone from the upper and mid-ureter by retrograde instrumentation were similar, but ancillary measures were needed in 20% of cases. Endoscopic management with rod-lens ureteroscopes was highly efficient in the distal and mid-ureter, but involved a complication rate of about 11% and required general anaesthesia. In the upper ureter it was abandoned in favour of the two former methods. Endoscopic stone removal has been greatly facilitated by the development of ultrathin, semirigid ureteroscopes 6.2-9 F in diameter, as well as by laser and pneumatic lithotriptors that operate through their minute working ports. Of the stones impacted in 127 ureteric units, 97% were successfully managed at the first attempt, involving an overall complication rate of 6%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8490668     DOI: 10.1007/BF00182172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  16 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the prone position: treatment of stones in the distal ureter or anomalous kidney.

Authors:  A D Jenkins; J Y Gillenwater
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Semirigid ureteroscopy: a new genre.

Authors:  S P Dretler; G Cho
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Ureteroscopy.

Authors:  M L Blute; J W Segura; D E Patterson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  ESWL and endourology on the same table: a feasible concept?

Authors:  W Albrecht; C Türk; M Marberger
Journal:  J Lithotr Stone Dis       Date:  1990-10

5.  Ureteral stones: the results of primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  D Holden; P N Rao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Late sequelae of the management of ureteral calculi with the ureterorenoscope.

Authors:  W Stackl; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Primary choice of intervention for distal ureteric stone: ureteroscopy or ESWL?

Authors:  S R el-Faqih; I Husain; P E Ekman; N D Sharma; A Chakrabarty; R Talic
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1988-07

8.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases.

Authors:  J Graff; J Pastor; P J Funke; P Mach; T Senge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Treatment of distal ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Experience with 264 cases.

Authors:  C Zehntner; G A Casanova; D Marth; E J Zingg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings.

Authors:  S C Mueller; D Wilbert; J W Thueroff; P Alken
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

1.  Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Nikolaos Polimeros; Adamantios Kavouras; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

3.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: minimally invasive second line treatment.

Authors:  Costantino Leonardo; Giuseppe Simone; Papalia Rocco; Salvatore Guaglianone; Giovanni Di Pierro; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Prediction of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones.

Authors:  Muwafak Salman; Abdulla A Al-Ansari; Raidh A Talib; El-Fadil El-Malik; Issam A Al-Bozaom; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.

Authors:  Ki Don Chang; Joo Yong Lee; Sung Yoon Park; Dong Hyuk Kang; Hyung Ho Lee; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Shock wave lithotripsy as a primary modality for treating upper ureteric stones: A 10-year experience.

Authors:  Abhijit S Padhye; Pushkaraj B Yadav; Pratikshit M Mahajan; Ashish A Bhave; Yogesh B Kshirsagar; Yogesh B Sovani; Shivadeo S Bapat
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.