Literature DB >> 3959215

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings.

S C Mueller, D Wilbert, J W Thueroff, P Alken.   

Abstract

ESWL of impacted ureteral or caliceal stones is not as successful as expected. To study this problem a model for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones has been designed. After initial fragmentation of the outer shell of impacted stones during the first series of shock wave application those fragments are kept in place by external mucosal contact, creating a lot of new interfaces. Absorption or reflection of shock wave energy within this fragmented shell seems to be responsible for the poor success rate in these cases. In regard to our experimental and clinical results we advise pushing ureteral stones back into the renal collecting system by means of a ureteral catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3959215     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45870-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Theory, efficacy, and adverse effects.

Authors:  J M Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-07

Review 2.  ESWL '90--state of the art. Limitations and future trends of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; P Alken
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1990

3.  Push and smash increases success rates in treatment of ureteric calculi by ESWL.

Authors:  A J Gross; A Kugler; F Seseke; R H Ringert
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Is high diuresis an important prerequisite for successful SWL-disintegration of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Trine Aronsen; Stina Bohgard; Marita Fredriksson; Elsie-Marie Jonason; Monica Olsson; Kristina Sjöström
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-08

5.  ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones?

Authors:  J Hofbauer; C Tuerk; K Höbarth; R Hasun; M Marberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Using cholecystokinin to facilitate endoscopic clearance of large common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Qi-Jie Zhang; Ming Zhang; Xiao Zhu; Shu-Xia Sun; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Does stone dimension affect the effectiveness of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in distal ureteral stones?

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Ali Ihsan Taşci; Emin Ozbek; Bekir Aras; Levent Verim; Levent Gürkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi.

Authors:  E Guntekin; E Kukul; Z Kayacan; M Baykara; M Sevuk
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Factors influencing the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with Piezolith 3000 in the management of solitary ureteral stone.

Authors:  Insang Hwang; Seung-Il Jung; Kwang Ho Kim; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Sun-Ouck Kim; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Extracorporeal lithotripsy and combined surgical procedures in the treatment of renoureteral stone disease: our experience with 2,955 patients.

Authors:  P Rigatti; F Francesca; F Montorsi; P Consonni; G Guazzoni; V Di Girolamo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.