Literature DB >> 21110095

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: minimally invasive second line treatment.

Costantino Leonardo1, Giuseppe Simone, Papalia Rocco, Salvatore Guaglianone, Giovanni Di Pierro, Michele Gallucci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe our experience of 33 laparoscopic ureterolithotomies for large ureteral stones.
METHODS: Since February 2004, in our department, 33 patients had undergone laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Inclusion criteria were failure of SWL and\or ureteroscopic treatment. Stones were located in the lower ureter in 9 patients, in the mid ureter in 16 patients, and in the upper ureter in 8 patients.
RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 47 years (range 37-51). The mean stone size, at preoperative IVP, was 34 mm (range 18-55). All stones were impacted from 4 to 36 months before procedure. Successful rates were 100%. No conversion to open surgery occurred. No intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred. Mean operating time was 85 min (range 60-160). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 70 ml (range 30-120). Mean hospital stay was 3.4 days (range 2-7). Mean follow-up was 24 months (range 6-44). During follow-up, no major complications were observed in any patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In our hand, first-line treatment after failure of SWL and\ or ureteroscopy is laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Large stone size and previous open surgery did not affect the successful rates of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110095     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9872-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a comparison between the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve.

Authors:  Pierluigi Bove; Salvatore Micali; Roberto Miano; Gabriella Mirabile; Stefano De Stafani; Edoardo Botteri; Bianchi Giampaolo; Giuseppe Vespasiani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy for impacted ureteral stones.

Authors:  W C Lee; H H Hsieh
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2000-01

3.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteric calculi.

Authors:  C Nualyong; T Taweemonkongsap
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  1999-10

4.  Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive?

Authors:  P Fornara; C Doehn; M Seyfarth; D Jocham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  S Micali; R G Moore; T D Averch; J B Adams; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy: initial experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Yassine Nouira; Yosri Kallel; Mohamed Y Binous; Hammadi Dahmoul; Ali Horchani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Special considerations in the technique of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.

Authors:  G C Bellman; A D Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  M L Paik; M A Wainstein; J P Spirnak; N Hampel; M I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for recurrent lower-ureteral stones previously treated with open ureterolithotomy: initial experience in 11 cases.

Authors:  Ahmad Abolyosr
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Abbas Basiri; Nasser Simforoosh; Amirmohsen Ziaee; Hamid Shayaninasab; Seyed Mohamad Mehdi Hosseini Moghaddam; Samad Zare
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  6 in total

1.  Should we place ureteral stents in retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy?: Consideration of surgical techniques and complications.

Authors:  Jae Hyung You; Young Gon Kim; Myung Ki Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-08-08

2.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for proximal ureteral calculi in selected patients.

Authors:  Qingfeng Hu; Weihong Ding; Yuancheng Gou; Yatfaat Ho; Ke Xu; Bin Gu; Chuanyu Sun; Guowei Xia; Qiang Ding
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-08

3.  The impact of preoperative percutaneous nephrostomy as a treatment strategy before flexible ureteroscopy for impacted upper ureteral stones with hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Go Anan; Daisuke Kudo; Toshimitsu Matsuoka; Yasuhiro Kaiho; Makoto Sato
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

4.  A case of delayed diagnosis of bilateral ureteral and bladder injury after laparoscopic hysterectomy: an unusual complication.

Authors:  Maximilien C Goris-Gbenou; Nicolas Arfi; Abdel Mitach; Sheer Rashed; Jean-Gabriel Lopez
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2012-11-06

5.  Laparoscopic management of distal ureteric stones in a bilharzial ureter: Results of a single-centre prospective study.

Authors:  Hani H Nour; Samir E Elgobashy; Amr Elkholy; Ahmad M Kamal; Mamdouh A Roshdy; Ahmad G Elbaz; Essam Riad
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-07-31

6.  Efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of large proximal ureteric stones and its impact on renal function.

Authors:  Takahiro Yasui; Atsushi Okada; Shuzo Hamamoto; Kazumi Taguchi; Ryosuke Ando; Kentaro Mizuno; Yasunori Itoh; Keiichi Tozawa; Yutaro Hayashi; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-11-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.