Literature DB >> 8490615

Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement.

P D Cleary1, D T Reilly, S Greenfield, A G Mulley, L Wexler, F Frankel, B J McNeil.   

Abstract

Data on disease severity, co-morbidity, and process of care were obtained from the medical records of 356 patients without rheumatoid arthritis undergoing a first unilateral total hip replacement at four teaching hospitals in California and Massachusetts. Socio-demographic characteristics, functional status prior and subsequent to hospitalization, and improvement in health status were measured with a patient questionnaire 12 months after discharge. Completed questionnaires were received from 284 patients, a response rate of 79.8%. The questionnaire was acceptable to patients, reliable, and had good construct validity. The data indicate substantial benefits from hip arthroplasty. As expected, pre-surgical functioning was a strong predictor of outcomes 1 year after surgery. Controlling for pre-surgical functioning, age was not related to outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8490615     DOI: 10.1007/BF00642884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  43 in total

1.  The quality of life, research, and care.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Evaluation of results of total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Strategies for improving and expanding the application of health status measures in clinical settings. A researcher-developer viewpoint.

Authors:  R A Deyo; W B Carter
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care.

Authors:  A M Jette; A R Davies; P D Cleary; D R Calkins; L V Rubenstein; A Fink; J Kosecoff; R T Young; R H Brook; T L Delbanco
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.

Authors:  M H Liang; M G Larson; K E Cullen; J A Schwartz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1985-05

7.  Advances in assessing rheumatoid arthritis: functional assessment.

Authors:  K E Burton; V Wright
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1983-08

8.  Work disability before and after total hip arthroplasty. Assessment of effectiveness in reducing disability.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; W V Epstein; M Masem; W R Murray
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1984-04

9.  The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales.

Authors:  J F Fries; P W Spitz; D Y Young
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  S Greenfield; D M Blanco; R M Elashoff; P A Ganz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study.

Authors:  P Rissanen; S Aro; H Sintonen; P Slätis; P Paavolainen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

3.  Determinants of health-related quality of life after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  K J Rose; P A Derry; S Wiebe; R S McLachian
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Health-related quality of life after elective surgery: measurement of longitudinal changes.

Authors:  C M Mangione; L Goldman; E J Orav; E R Marcantonio; A Pedan; L E Ludwig; M C Donaldson; D J Sugarbaker; R Poss; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; R Morris; S Hajat; B Reeves; D W Murray; D Hannen; M Rigge; O Williams; P Gregg
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

6.  Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford hip score in mixed methods.

Authors:  R McMurray; J Heaton; P Sloper; S Nettleton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

7.  Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement.

Authors:  C H MacWilliam; M U Yood; J J Verner; B D McCarthy; R E Ward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Patients' reasons for electing to undergo total knee arthroplasty impact post-operative pain severity and range of motion.

Authors:  Julie K Cremeans-Smith; Jessica M Boarts; Kenneth Greene; Douglas L Delahanty
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-01-10

9.  Retrieval Findings of Recalled Dual-Taper Hips.

Authors:  Anna Di Laura; Harry S Hothi; Johann Henckel; Young-Min Kwon; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Predictors of outcomes of recovery following total hip replacement surgery: A prospective study.

Authors:  G A McHugh; M Campbell; K A Luker
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.853

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.