Literature DB >> 9383137

Health-related quality of life after elective surgery: measurement of longitudinal changes.

C M Mangione1, L Goldman, E J Orav, E R Marcantonio, A Pedan, L E Ludwig, M C Donaldson, D J Sugarbaker, R Poss, T H Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the responsiveness of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to clinical changes in three surgical groups and to study how health-related quality of life (HRQL) changes with time among patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty, thoracic surgery for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with serial evaluations of HRQL preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.
SETTING: University tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Of 528 patients, more than 50 years of age, who were admitted for these elective procedures, 454 (86%) provided preoperative health status data and are members of the study cohort. At 12 months after surgery, 439 (93%) of the cohort was successfully contacted and 390 (90%) provided follow-up interviews.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36, the Specific Activity Scale, five validated health transition questions, and a 0 to 100 scale measure of global health were used to assess changes in health status at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Change in health status as measured by the SF-36 demonstrated that physical function and role limitations due to physical health problems were worse 1 month after these three surgeries. However, by 6 months after surgery, most patients experienced significant gains in the majority of the dimensions of health, and these gains were sustained at 12 months after surgery. Longitudinal changes in the SF-36 were positively associated with responses to the five health transition questions, to changes on the Specific Activity Scale and global health rating question, and to clinical parameters for persons who had AAA repair. These findings indicate that the SF-36 has evidence of validity and is responsive to expected changes in HRQL after elective surgery for these procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: For the total hip arthroplasty patients, responsiveness was greatest for the SF-36 scales that measure physical constructs. However, for the two other procedures and at various points of recovery, significant changes were observed for all eight subscales, suggesting that responsiveness was dependent on the type of surgery and the timing of follow-up, and that multidimensional measures are needed to fully capture changes in HRQL after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9383137      PMCID: PMC1497188          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07142.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  48 in total

1.  Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; J W Bush; C C Berry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Estimation of maximum oxygen uptake from clinical data: performance of the Specific Activity Scale.

Authors:  T H Lee; J B Shammash; J P Ribeiro; L H Hartley; J Sherwood; L Goldman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care.

Authors:  A M Jette; A R Davies; P D Cleary; D R Calkins; L V Rubenstein; A Fink; J Kosecoff; R T Young; R H Brook; T L Delbanco
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.

Authors:  S M Hunt; J McEwen; S P McKenna
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-04

6.  Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.

Authors:  M H Liang; M G Larson; K E Cullen; J A Schwartz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1985-05

7.  Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale.

Authors:  L Goldman; B Hashimoto; E F Cook; A Loscalzo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W B Carter; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Assessment of patient outcomes after operation for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  R E Burney; K R Jones; J W Coon; D K Blewitt; A M Herm
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  33 in total

1.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Evidence-Based Surgery. Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess an article on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Sylvie D Cornacchi; Peter J Lovrics; Charlie H Goldsmith
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Insights and limitations from health-related quality-of-life research.

Authors:  G Guyatt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Reverse-total shoulder arthroplasty cost-effectiveness: A quality-adjusted life years comparison with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Bachman; John Nyland; Ryan Krupp
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 5.  The impact of non-traumatic hip and knee disorders on health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12. A systematic review.

Authors:  Johanna M van der Waal; Caroline B Terwee; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter; Joost Dekker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Chronic postthoracotomy pain and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Michelle A O Kinney; W Michael Hooten; Stephen D Cassivi; Mark S Allen; Melissa A Passe; Andrew C Hanson; Darrell R Schroeder; Carlos B Mantilla
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Quality of life and utility in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Quality-of-life Study Group of the Master 2 Project in Pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  S Trippoli; M Vaiani; C Lucioni; A Messori
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Survivorship in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges Faced and Steps Forward.

Authors:  Namrata Vijayvergia; Prashant C Shah; Crystal S Denlinger
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Effect of lung cancer surgery on quality of life.

Authors:  T Win; L Sharples; F C Wells; A J Ritchie; H Munday; C M Laroche
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Development and validation of the convalescence and recovery evaluation (CARE) for measuring quality of life after surgery.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Rodney L Dunn; J Stuart Wolf; Martin G Sanda; David P Wood; Scott M Gilbert; Alon Z Weizer; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.