Literature DB >> 8943994

Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement.

C H MacWilliam1, M U Yood, J J Verner, B D McCarthy, R E Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with poor outcome after total hip replacement (THR) surgery. DATA SOURCES: This article is the first to present results from the American Medical Group Association (AMGA) THR consortium. STUDY
DESIGN: The outcomes evaluated were pain and physical function. Eight patient risk factors were evaluated. These included the age, sex, race, marital status, and education of the patient; whether the patient had polyarticular disease or other comorbid conditions; and the patient's preoperative pain and physical function score. DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected from patients using AMGA-approved, self-administered questionnaires preoperatively and at six weeks, three months, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Of the patient risk factors studied, race, education, number of comorbid conditions, and preoperative Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) score were found to be associated with poor outcome. These risk factors were found to have an effect on both pain and physical function at six months postoperatively. Patients with higher preoperative scores were found to have higher postoperative scores, but substantially fewer of these patients received any benefit from their surgery. For each 10-point increase in preoperative score, patients could expect at least a 6-point decrease in postoperative improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that preoperative status is an important predictor of outcome for THR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8943994      PMCID: PMC1070145     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  27 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M H Liang; K E Cullen; M G Larson; M S Thompson; J A Schwartz; A H Fossel; W N Roberts; C B Sledge
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1986-08

2.  Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience.

Authors:  P M Ellwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Poverty and health. Prospective evidence from the Alameda County Study.

Authors:  M Haan; G A Kaplan; T Camacho
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The effects of race and body habitus on bone mineral density of the radius, hip, and spine in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Y Liel; J Edwards; J Shary; K M Spicer; L Gordon; N H Bell
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Orthopaedic clinical research. Deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome.

Authors:  J J Gartland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Evidence for alteration of the vitamin D-endocrine system in blacks.

Authors:  N H Bell; A Greene; S Epstein; M J Oexmann; S Shaw; J Shary
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Recovery of function after hip fracture. The role of social supports.

Authors:  S R Cummings; S L Phillips; M E Wheat; D Black; E Goosby; D Wlodarczyk; P Trafton; H Jergesen; C H Winograd; S B Hulley
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  A time-insensitive predictive instrument for acute hospital mortality due to congestive heart failure: development, testing, and use for comparing hospitals: a multicenter study.

Authors:  H P Selker; J L Griffith; R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: improvement in pain and functional status.

Authors:  P P Gogia; C M Christensen; C Schmidt
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  29 in total

1.  What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Vincent P Galea; James W Connelly; Sean J Matuszak; Ola Rolfson; Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Surgical patients with chronic pain or chronic postsurgical pain: a prospective analysis of psychological and social factors].

Authors:  C J P Simanski; C Pape-Köhler; K Kreutz; R Lefering; P Hoederath; S Hoederath; A Althaus; B Bouillon; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Medical comorbidity is associated with persistent index hip pain after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; I F Petersson; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Oxford hip scores at 6 months and 5 years are associated with total hip revision within the subsequent 2 years.

Authors:  Peter Devane; Geoffrey Horne; Daniel J Gehling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Higher comorbidity, poor functional status and higher health care utilization in veterans with prevalent total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeffrey Sloan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Predictors of pain and use of pain medications following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): 5,707 THAs at 2-years and 3,289 THAs at 5-years.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David Lewallen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Christine M Pui; Matthew J Ludeman; Thomas P Vail; Marc D Silverstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement.

Authors:  V Wylde; S L Whitehouse; A H Taylor; G T Pattison; G C Bannister; A W Blom
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery.

Authors:  Cédric Baumann; Anne Christine Rat; Georges Osnowycz; Didier Mainard; Christian Cuny; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.