Literature DB >> 10847884

Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford hip score in mixed methods.

R McMurray1, J Heaton, P Sloper, S Nettleton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the practical difficulties experienced by patients when completing the Oxford hip score, and to highlight the need to reconsider aspects of its structure and conceptual base.
DESIGN: Qualitative study incorporating the Oxford hip score in semi-structured interviews with patients before and four months after their operation.
SETTING: Two hospitals in the North of England.
SUBJECTS: Osteoarthritic patients undergoing primary elective total hip replacement.
RESULTS: Use of the Oxford hip score provided quantitative data on disability in the sample, particularly about pain and immobility. It also facilitated the collection of qualitative data, serving as a useful starting point for interviews and as a prompt for indepth discussion. Concerns about the clarity, coverage, and content validity of the score were identified, however, raising questions about the measure's conceptual base.
CONCLUSION: The Oxford hip score was found to be a useful precursor to the semi-structured interviews. However, deficiencies in instruction and lack of clarity in purpose have implications for its ongoing development and future application, both in this type of study and other, more general, contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10847884      PMCID: PMC2483663          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.8.4.228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  13 in total

1.  Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Fletcher; S Gore; D Jones; D Spiegelhalter; D Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

2.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr; D Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

3.  Local voices: evolving a realistic strategy on public consultation.

Authors:  A Summers; K McKeown
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  An empirical analysis of the dimensions of health status measures.

Authors:  J Segovia; R F Bartlett; A C Edwards
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

Review 6.  Assessing the need for health status measures.

Authors:  J L Donovan; S J Frankel; J D Eyles
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Staff and patient feedback in mental health services for older people.

Authors:  D J Brooker; C J Dinshaw
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

8.  Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement.

Authors:  P D Cleary; D T Reilly; S Greenfield; A G Mulley; L Wexler; F Frankel; B J McNeil
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  How measurement techniques influence estimates of disability in older populations.

Authors:  A M Jette
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G Wright; S Rudicel; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; J M Norquist; C Jenkinson; B C Reeves; R W Morris; D W Murray; P J Gregg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; R Morris; S Hajat; B Reeves; D W Murray; D Hannen; M Rigge; O Williams; P Gregg
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

3.  Relationship between cup position and obturator externus muscle in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Marc Dewey; Ivonne Springer; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Cerebral microembolization during primary total hip arthroplasty and neuropsychologic outcome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rahul V Patel; Jan Stygall; Jane Harrington; Stanton P Newman; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford hip score.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Marc Sieverding; Franco M Impellizzeri; Fabian von Knoch; Anne F Mannion; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Translation and cultural adaptation of the oxford hip score for Iranian population.

Authors:  Mohsen Nourbakhsh; Abolghasem Zarezadeh; Hamidreza Shemshaki; Mohammad R Etemadifar; Mehdi Moezi; Farhad Mazoochian
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-02

7.  The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Ian D Learmonth; Victoria J Cavendish
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Use of computerised adaptive testing to reduce the number of items in patient-reported hip and knee outcome scores: an analysis of the NHS England National Patient-Reported Outcome Measures programme.

Authors:  Jonathan Peter Evans; Christopher Gibbons; Andrew D Toms; Jose Maria Valderas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.006

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.