Literature DB >> 4004963

Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.

M H Liang, M G Larson, K E Cullen, J A Schwartz.   

Abstract

Five health status instruments were administered in random order to 50 arthritis patients before and after total joint arthroplasty. Relative efficiency and sensitivity in measurement of change in pain, mobility and physical function, social role and social activity, and global health were assessed. The instruments had highly correlated scores, but had differences in certain dimensions. Inter-instrument differentials were larger for social and global outcomes than for pain or mobility. NO single instrument consistently outperformed the others. A method for determining relative efficiency is described.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1985        PMID： 4004963     DOI： 10.1002/art.1780280513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN： 0004-3591


  101 in total

1.  A new tool for monitoring asthma outcomes: the ITG Asthma Short Form.

Authors:  M S Bayliss; D M Espindle; D Buchner; M S Blaiss; J E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of measures to assess change in diagnostic performance due to a decision support system.

Authors:  R S Maisiak; E S Berner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: a community based study in Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors:  T V Perneger; J F Etter; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Measuring health status? A review of the sickness impact and functional limitations profiles.

Authors:  S J Williams
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-11

6.  Visual analogical well-being scale for sleep apnea patients: validity and responsiveness : a test for clinical practice.

Authors:  Juan F Masa; Antonio Jiménez; Joaquín Durán; Carmen Carmona; Carmen Monasterio; Mercedes Mayos; Joaquín Terán; Ferrán Barbé; Manuela Rubio; Inmaculada Failde; Manuel Mota; José M Montserrat
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 7.  Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; S J Veldhuyzen Van Zanten; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Development of the KOOSglobal Platform to Measure Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cale A Jacobs; Michael R Peabody; Christian Lattermann; Jose F Vega; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Emily K Reinke; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright; Armando F Vidal
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Effects of total hip replacement on quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Borstlap; J L Zant; M Van Soesbergen; J K Van der Korst
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement.

Authors:  P D Cleary; D T Reilly; S Greenfield; A G Mulley; L Wexler; F Frankel; B J McNeil
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.147
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.