Literature DB >> 8487192

Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation.

P J Maccabee1, V E Amassian, L P Eberle, R Q Cracco.   

Abstract

1. According to classical cable theory, a magnetic coil (MC) should excite a linear nerve fibre in a homogeneous medium at the negative-going first spatial derivative of the induced electric field. This prediction was tested by MC stimulation of mammalian phrenic and amphibian sciatic nerve and branches in vitro, immersed in Ringer solution within a trough, and identifying the sites of excitation by recording responses of similar latency to local electrical stimulation. Subsequently, the identified sites of excitation were compared with measurements of the induced electric field and its calculated first spatial derivative. A special hardware device was used to selectively reverse MC current direction and to generate predominantly monophasic- or polyphasic-induced pulse profiles whose initial phases were identical in polarity, shape and amplitude. When using the amphibian nerve preparation, a complication was excitation at low threshold points related to cut branches. 2. Reversal of monophasic current resulted in latency shifts corresponding approximately to the distance between induced cathode and anode. The location of each site of excitation was at, or very near, the negative-going first spatial derivative peaks of the induced electric field measured parallel to the straight nerve. Significantly, excitation of the nerve did not occur at the peak of the induced electric field above the centre of the 'figure of eight' MC junction. 3. A polyphasic pulse excited the nerve at both sites, by the negative-going first phase at one location, and approximately 150 microseconds later, by the reversed negative-going second phase at the other location. Polyphasic and monophasic pulses elicited responses with similar latency when the induced current flowed towards the recording electrode. 4. Straddling a nerve with non-coding solid lucite cylinders created a localized spatial narrowing and increase in the induced electric field, resulting in a lowered threshold of excitation. The corresponding closer spacing between first spatial derivative peaks was exhibited by a significant reduction in latency shift when MC current direction was reversed. 5. When a nerve is bent and the induced current is directed along the nerve towards the bend, the threshold of excitation is reduced there. Increasing the angle of the bend from 0 deg to more than 90 deg graded the decrease in threshold. 6. In a straight nerve the threshold was lowest when current was directed towards the cut end.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8487192      PMCID: PMC1175209          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  15 in total

1.  Developing a more focal magnetic stimulator. Part I: Some basic principles.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 2.  Peripheral nerve stimulation by induced electric currents: exposure to time-varying magnetic fields.

Authors:  J P Reilly
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The influence of stimulus type on the magnetic excitation of nerve structures.

Authors:  D Claus; N M Murray; A Spitzer; D Flügel
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-04

4.  Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations.

Authors:  L G Cohen; B J Roth; J Nilsson; N Dang; M Panizza; S Bandinelli; W Friauf; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-04

5.  Measurement of the electric field induced into inhomogeneous volume conductors by magnetic coils: application to human spinal neurogeometry.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; V E Amassian; L P Eberle; A P Rudell; R Q Cracco; K S Lai; M Somasundarum
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06

6.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex.

Authors:  V E Amassian; R Q Cracco; P J Maccabee; J B Cracco; A Rudell; L Eberle
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

7.  An analysis of peripheral motor nerve stimulation in humans using the magnetic coil.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; V E Amassian; R Q Cracco; J A Cadwell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-12

8.  Magnetic stimulation over the spinal enlargements.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Focal stimulation of human peripheral nerve with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  V E Amassian; P J Maccabee; R Q Cracco
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  59 in total

1.  Magnetic and electrical stimulation of undulating nerve fibres: a simulation study.

Authors:  V Schnabel; J J Struijk
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Functional localization in the human brain: Gradient-Echo, Spin-Echo, and arterial spin-labeling fMRI compared with neuronavigated TMS.

Authors:  Svenja Diekhoff; Kamil Uludağ; Roland Sparing; Marc Tittgemeyer; Mustafa Cavuşoğlu; D Yves von Cramon; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets.

Authors:  Janine D Bijsterbosch; Anthony T Barker; Kwang-Hyuk Lee; P W R Woodruff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Transmembrane potential generated by a magnetically induced transverse electric field in a cylindrical axonal model.

Authors:  Hui Ye; Marija Cotic; Michael G Fehlings; Peter L Carlen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Magnetic stimulation of one-dimensional neuronal cultures.

Authors:  Assaf Rotem; Elisha Moses
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Magnetic stimulation of ferret papillary muscle.

Authors:  S Weidmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  High- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially activates c-Fos and zif268 protein expression in the rat brain.

Authors:  Selcen Aydin-Abidin; Jörn Trippe; Klaus Funke; Ulf T Eysel; Alia Benali
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.