Literature DB >> 22678596

Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets.

Janine D Bijsterbosch1, Anthony T Barker, Kwang-Hyuk Lee, P W R Woodruff.   

Abstract

Computational models have been be used to estimate the electric and magnetic fields induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and can provide valuable insights into the location and spatial distribution of TMS stimulation. However, there has been little translation of these findings into practical TMS research. This study uses the International 10-20 EEG electrode placement system to position a standard figure-of-eight TMS coil over 13 commonly adopted targets. Using a finite element method and an anatomically detailed and realistic head model, this study provides the first pictorial and numerical atlas of TMS-induced electric fields for a range of coil positions. The results highlight the importance of subject-specific gyral folding patterns and of local thickness of subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Our modelling shows that high electric fields occur primarily on the peaks of those gyri which have only a thin layer of CSF above them. These findings have important implications for inter-individual generalizability of the TMS-induced electric field. We propose that, in order to determine with accuracy the site of stimulation for an individual subject, it is necessary to solve the electric field distribution using subject-specific anatomy obtained from a high-resolution imaging modality such as MRI.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678596     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0922-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  56 in total

1.  The history and basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A T Barker
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  S H Lisanby; D Gutman; B Luber; C Schroeder; H A Sackeim
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Patrick Dubach; Adrian G Guggisberg; Kai M Rösler; Christian W Hess; Johannes Mathis
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Axel Thielscher; Alexander Opitz; Mirko Windhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A reconstruction of the conductive phenomena elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue.

Authors:  Nicola Toschi; Tobias Welt; Maria Guerrisi; Martin E Keck
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  The electric field induced in the brain by magnetic stimulation: a 3-D finite-element analysis of the effect of tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy.

Authors:  Pedro C Miranda; Mark Hallett; Peter J Basser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Magnetic stimulation of the nervous system: induced electric field in unbounded, semi-infinite, spherical, and cylindrical media.

Authors:  P Ravazzani; J Ruohonen; F Grandori; G Tognola
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  3D modeling of the total electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation using the boundary element method.

Authors:  F S Salinas; J L Lancaster; P T Fox
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  34 in total

1.  The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamed K Metwally; Seung Moo Han; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

4.  Biophysical determinants of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of excitability and depth of targeted area.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Anthony T Barker; Martynas Dervinis; Frederick Verbruggen; Leah Maizey; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effect of local anatomy on the electric field induced by TMS: evaluation at 14 different target sites.

Authors:  Arno M Janssen; Thom F Oostendorp; Dick F Stegeman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Fronto-Parietal Anatomical Connections Influence the Modulation of Conscious Visual Perception by High-Beta Frontal Oscillatory Activity.

Authors:  Romain Quentin; Lorena Chanes; Marine Vernet; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Retinal and visual cortex distance from transcranial magnetic stimulation of the vertex affects phosphene perception.

Authors:  Kelly Webster; Tony Ro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Moritz Dannhauer; Lari M Koponen; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Fronto-tectal white matter connectivity mediates facilitatory effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on visual detection.

Authors:  Romain Quentin; Lorena Chanes; Raffaella Migliaccio; Romain Valabrègue; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A generalized workflow for conducting electric field-optimized, fMRI-guided, transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Camille Roberts; Emily M Beydler; Zhi-De Deng; Thomas Radman; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.