Literature DB >> 1691084

Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations.

L G Cohen1, B J Roth, J Nilsson, N Dang, M Panizza, S Bandinelli, W Friauf, M Hallett.   

Abstract

The localization of effects from magnetic coil stimulation is not immediately obvious. We measured the magnetic fields produced by several different coils and compared the results with theoretical calculations. Magnetic stimuli were delivered from a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator using 3 circular coils (one 9 cm in diameter; two with an angulated extension, 5 and 9 cm in diameter) and twin oval coils arranged in a butterfly shape (each coil approximately 4 cm in diameter) and from a Novametrix Magstim 200 using two circular flat-spiral coils (6.7 and 14 cm in diameter). Peak-induced strength of the magnetic field was recorded with a measuring loop (1 cm in diameter) at different distances from the center of the coil. When the measuring loop was moved in the same plane laterally from the center of the coil, for all coils except the butterfly-shaped coil, the field was highest in the center and fell off near the circumference of the coil. The field dropped progressively when measurements were made more distant from the plane of the coils. The electric field induced from the magnetic coil could be calculated from the coil geometry. For all coils except the butterfly-shaped coil, the largest electric field was at the circumference of the coils. The 6.7 cm flat-spiral coil induced currents similar to those induced by the larger coils but more focally. The butterfly-shaped coil induced the largest currents under its center, where the circumferences of the two component coils come together. The component of the electric field parallel to the wire in the center of this coil was the largest and most localized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1691084     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90113-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  70 in total

Review 1.  Improvement of depression following transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  M S George; Z Nahas; F A Kozel; J Goldman; M Molloy; N Oliver
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Bartres-Faz; J P Keenan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Magnetic and electrical stimulation of undulating nerve fibres: a simulation study.

Authors:  V Schnabel; J J Struijk
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials.

Authors:  L D Gugino; J R Romero; L Aglio; D Titone; M Ramirez; A Pascual-Leone; E Grimson; N Weisenfeld; R Kikinis; M E Shenton
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation and response bias in a forced-choice task.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; A Pascual-Leone; J Valls-Solé; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Electric field induced in a spherical volume conductor from arbitrary coils: application to magnetic stimulation and MEG.

Authors:  H Eaton
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets.

Authors:  Janine D Bijsterbosch; Anthony T Barker; Kwang-Hyuk Lee; P W R Woodruff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Perceptual learning of line orientation modifies the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex.

Authors:  K Neary; S Anand; J R Hotson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.