Literature DB >> 1691083

The influence of stimulus type on the magnetic excitation of nerve structures.

D Claus1, N M Murray, A Spitzer, D Flügel.   

Abstract

The voltage measured was that induced in a measuring coil from 3 different commercially available magnetic stimulators. The strongest stimulus was from the Cadwell, followed by Novametrix and then Digitimer. The Digitimer and Novametrix produced a monophasic pulse, whilst the Cadwell stimulator produced a polyphasic pulse, all measured by an induction coil. This is thought to be the reason why reversed coil polarity does not influence the position of peripheral nerve excitation with a Cadwell stimulator; this is, however, the case with the two other magnetic stimulators. Nevertheless, electrical stimulation was found to be the most useful method for exciting peripheral nerves. The lack of influence of Cadwell coil polarity on the excitation of spinal roots and motor cortex is also thought to be due to the bipolar stimulus effect mentioned above. The stimuli induced by Digitimer and Novametrix are monophasic, exciting one hemisphere first, depending on the direction of the current impulse. The stimulus generated by Cadwell excites both hemispheres by reversal of current direction.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1691083     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90112-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  10 in total

Review 1.  Occupational exposure in MRI.

Authors:  D W McRobbie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Motor evoked potentials to magnetic stimulation: technical considerations and normative data from 50 subjects.

Authors:  A Furby; J L Bourriez; J M Jacquesson; F Mounier-Vehier; J D Guieu
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Motor cortical representation of the diaphragm in man.

Authors:  D Maskill; K Murphy; A Mier; M Owen; A Guz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; V E Amassian; L P Eberle; R Q Cracco
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Modular multilevel TMS device with wide output range and ultrabrief pulse capability for sound reduction.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zeng; Lari M Koponen; Rena Hamdan; Zhongxi Li; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; S S Nagarajan; V E Amassian; D M Durand; A Z Szabo; A B Ahad; R Q Cracco; K S Lai; L P Eberle
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The role of pulse shape in motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation using full-sine stimuli.

Authors:  Igor Delvendahl; Norbert Gattinger; Thomas Berger; Bernhard Gleich; Hartwig R Siebner; Volker Mall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Analysis and optimization of pulse dynamics for magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Cong Nam Truong; Manuel G Gerhofer; Angel V Peterchev; Hans-Georg Herzog; Thomas Weyh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation with a half-sine wave pulse elicits direction-specific effects in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Nikolai H Jung; Igor Delvendahl; Astrid Pechmann; Bernhard Gleich; Norbert Gattinger; Hartwig R Siebner; Volker Mall
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.288

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.