Literature DB >> 8476104

Distribution, propagation, and coordination of contractile activity in lymphatics.

D C Zawieja1, K L Davis, R Schuster, W M Hinds, H J Granger.   

Abstract

The propagation and coordination of lymphatic contractions were studied in the mesentery of the rat small intestine using in situ microscopic observation. Indexes of lymphatic diameter were simultaneously measured at two adjacent lymphangions in spontaneously contracting lymphatics (n = 51). Diameter index, contraction frequency, and the percentage of the intersegmental contractions that were propagated and coordinated (PP) were determined at both sites. The conduction velocity of the contractile activity and the percentage of the coordinated contractions that were propagated both antegrade to the direction of lymph flow and retrograde to the flow stream were determined. The results indicate that 1) 80-90% of the lymphatic contractions in the vessels we evaluated were propagated, 2) the wave of contractile activity propagated both centrally and peripherally, and 3) the conduction velocity of the contractile activity was approximately 4-8 mm/s. We tested the hypothesis that gap junctional communication is responsible for the coordination of the contractile event. To accomplish this, we used the gap junction blockers n-heptanol and oleic acid. PP was 90 +/- 4% under normal conditions and fell to a minimum value of 55 +/- 7% during the gap junction blockade. These results indicate that gap junctional communication played an important role in the propagation and coordination of contractions that occurred in spontaneously active lymphatics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476104     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.264.4.H1283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  71 in total

Review 1.  Lymphatic communication: connexin junction, what's your function?

Authors:  J D Kanady; A M Simon
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.286

2.  GJC2 missense mutations cause human lymphedema.

Authors:  Robert E Ferrell; Catherine J Baty; Mark A Kimak; Jenny M Karlsson; Elizabeth C Lawrence; Marlise Franke-Snyder; Stephen D Meriney; Eleanor Feingold; David N Finegold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Differential effects of myosin light chain kinase inhibition on contractility, force development and myosin light chain 20 phosphorylation of rat cervical and thoracic duct lymphatics.

Authors:  Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh; Sanjukta Chakraborty; Wei Wang; Michael J Davis; David C Zawieja; Mariappan Muthuchamy
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Connexin37 and Connexin43 deficiencies in mice disrupt lymphatic valve development and result in lymphatic disorders including lymphedema and chylothorax.

Authors:  John D Kanady; Michael T Dellinger; Stephanie J Munger; Marlys H Witte; Alexander M Simon
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Tissue contribution to the mechanical features of diaphragmatic initial lymphatics.

Authors:  Andrea Moriondo; Federica Boschetti; Francesca Bianchin; Simone Lattanzio; Cristiana Marcozzi; Daniela Negrini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Nonlinear lymphangion pressure-volume relationship minimizes edema.

Authors:  Arun M Venugopal; Randolph H Stewart; Glen A Laine; Christopher M Quick
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 7.  From optical bench to cageside: intravital microscopy on the long road to rational vaccine design.

Authors:  Heather D Hickman; Jack R Bennink; Jonathan W Yewdell
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.988

8.  Effects of dynamic shear and transmural pressure on wall shear stress sensitivity in collecting lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kornuta; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Olga Y Gasheva; Anish Mukherjee; David C Zawieja; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Mechanobiological oscillators control lymph flow.

Authors:  Christian Kunert; James W Baish; Shan Liao; Timothy P Padera; Lance L Munn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.

Authors:  Christopher D Bertram; Charlie Macaskill; Michael J Davis; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.